Prev: [UPD] TBird 3.1 available
Next: TBird 3.1 available
From: Craig on 24 Jun 2010 19:07 Just an fyi; Lightning 1.0 Beta 2 is the only version that supports TBird 3.1. It's in its 3rd RC iteration which... <ahem> is a lot for an RC. > Lightning 1.0 Beta 2 Release Candidate 3 is available > > This new release candidate contains fixes for a few locales, no > further code changes. Since the Thunderbird 3.1 release is scheduled > for this week, I assume this will be the final release candidate. > > Candidate builds for Lightning 1.0 beta2 in 33 languages are > available as of now for: > > * Windows > * Linux (32 bit) > * Linux (64 bit, contributed build) > * Mac OS X <http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/> -- -Craig
From: Craig on 24 Jun 2010 23:46 On 06/24/2010 05:28 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in news:i00oft$i0u$1 > @news.eternal-september.org: > >> Just an fyi; >> >> Lightning 1.0 Beta 2 is the only version that supports TBird 3.1. >> >> <http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/> >> > > Lags well behind what Google mail, calendar, et al have to offer. > You're comparing apples and oranges. -- -Craig
From: poutnik on 25 Jun 2010 01:07 In article <Xns9DA1C610C8891bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com says... > > > > Lags well behind what Google mail, calendar, et al have to offer. E.g. email client ? -- Poutnik The best depends on how the best is defined.
From: Craig on 25 Jun 2010 10:29 On 06/25/2010 03:34 AM, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> :> >> On 06/24/2010 05:28 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote: >>> Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com>: >>> >>>> Just an fyi; >>>> >>>> Lightning 1.0 Beta 2 is the only version that supports TBird 3.1. >> >>>> >>>> <http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/> >>>> >>> >>> Lags well behind what Google mail, calendar, et al have to offer. >>> >> >> You're comparing apples and oranges. >> > > Email is email. Calendars are calendars. Neither are apples or oranges. One's client-based the other is server-based. Apples & oranges. But you knew that already. -- -Craig
From: poutnik on 25 Jun 2010 11:41
In article <Xns9DA238B9BBFF8bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com says... > > >> > >> Lags well behind what Google mail, calendar, et al have to offer. > >> > > > > You're comparing apples and oranges. > > > > Email is email. Calendars are calendars. Neither are apples or oranges. I have heard the same story in a book and in the cinema does not create the same feeling. Is it true ? BTW I would never let Google to keep his hands on my emails. -- Poutnik The best depends on how the best is defined. |