Logos, images, embedded in email messages?
in [Mac Applications]
|
From: gl4317 on 17 Mar 2010 22:40 In article <1jfhmim.1uc3a261mtl0jwN%peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk>, peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote: > gl4317(a)yahoo.com <gl4317(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > I don't know about the modern versions, but in Eudora 3.1.1, the > > attachments setting includes a check box labeled "Trash Attachments with > > Message". If you select that, the image files go away when you delete the > > message. > > The point is that the OP also receives attached files that he wants to > keep. It's reliably and automagically differentiating between those, and > the logos, that is posing the problem. Then you don't delete those messages until you've moved the file somewhere that separates it from Eudora. -- -Glennl Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam, and most e-mail sent to this address are simply lost in the vast mess.
From: AES on 18 Mar 2010 00:45 In article <gl4317-1703101940130001(a)69-30-10-144.pxd.easystreet.com>, gl4317(a)yahoo.com (gl4317(a)yahoo.com) wrote: > > The point is that the OP also receives attached files that he wants to > > keep. It's reliably and automagically differentiating between those, and > > the logos, that is posing the problem. > > > Then you don't delete those messages until you've moved the file somewhere > that separates it from Eudora. .. . . or just renaming them, even trivially, will preserve them.
From: gl4317 on 20 Mar 2010 00:57 In article <80iqbbF71aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, jeffrey+news(a)goldmark.org wrote: > Attachments and forwarded messages get even worse. There are two ways > of forwarding a message (actually three, but nobody uses the third > anymore) ... If you are referring to the "bounce" (Eudora calls it "redirect") method of forwarding, I still use it whenever it is appropriate to do so. However, the problem is that Outlook doesn't have it as an option, and since that is now the default mail reader at so many locations most people don't know it is an option. -- -Glennl Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam, and most e-mail sent to this address are simply lost in the vast mess.
From: Bill on 20 Mar 2010 08:34 In article <gl4317-1903102157100001(a)69-30-9-188.pxd.easystreet.com>, gl4317(a)yahoo.com (gl4317(a)yahoo.com) wrote: > In article <80iqbbF71aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, jeffrey+news(a)goldmark.org wrote: > > > Attachments and forwarded messages get even worse. There are two ways > > of forwarding a message (actually three, but nobody uses the third > > anymore) ... > > > If you are referring to the "bounce" (Eudora calls it "redirect") method > of forwarding, I still use it whenever it is appropriate to do so. > However, the problem is that Outlook doesn't have it as an option, and > since that is now the default mail reader at so many locations most people > don't know it is an option. Redirect is an option with Apple Mac OS X Mail.
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on 20 Mar 2010 11:12
On 2010-03-19 11:57 PM, gl4317(a)yahoo.com wrote: > In article <80iqbbF71aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, jeffrey+news(a)goldmark.org wrote: > >> Attachments and forwarded messages get even worse. There are two ways >> of forwarding a message (actually three, but nobody uses the third >> anymore) ... > If you are referring to the "bounce" (Eudora calls it "redirect") method > of forwarding, I still use it whenever it is appropriate to do so. Yes, that is what I am referring to as the third way. I use it only when I know that the person I'm bouncing it to knows about this. Otherwise the new recipient can become confused. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts Reply-To address is valid |