Magnetism is really -- WHAT?
in [Design]
|
From: MooseFET on 1 Mar 2010 21:49 On Mar 1, 6:49 am, George Herold <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > > (click link) > > >http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > > Enjoy, > > > Fitz > > Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. Lack of evidence is poor evidence of lack. They may be like the Bogon (the carrier of the bogosity force). The only appear in physics near ship date or when the boss comes to see the new product.
From: George Herold on 1 Mar 2010 21:58 On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > >> (click link) > > >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > >> Enjoy, > > >> Fitz > > >Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. > > >George H. > > Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? > > The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the > field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC > Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply > have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, > non-grammatical "No ones..." "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an experimentalist. I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed that? George H.
From: George Herold on 1 Mar 2010 22:02 On Mar 1, 9:49 pm, MooseFET <kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote: > On Mar 1, 6:49 am, George Herold <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > > > (click link) > > > >http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > > > Enjoy, > > > > Fitz > > > Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. > > Lack of evidence is poor evidence of lack. > > They may be like the Bogon (the carrier of the bogosity force). > The only appear in physics near ship date or when the boss comes > to see the new product. Ohh I'm not saying they don't exist, just that no one has found one. I always figured that if there are monopoles they should come in both polarities. In which case they would bind together like atoms. And the only searches I've read about have looked for 'bare' monopoles. George H.
From: Tim Williams on 1 Mar 2010 23:25 "George Herold" <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ceb6bc6b-b097-4a09-a065-a6baa307e2fc(a)15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > Ohh I'm not saying they don't exist, just that no one has found one. > I always figured that if there are monopoles they should come in both > polarities. In which case they would bind together like atoms. And > the only searches I've read about have looked for 'bare' monopoles. Well, there's this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole#.22Monopoles.22_in_condensed-matter_systems An infinnitessimal flux tube just sounds like cheating div(B) = 0. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
From: Robert Baer on 2 Mar 2010 06:11
Magnetism is simply attractive; YOU on the other hand are an ugly PITA. |