Magnetism is really -- WHAT?
in [Design]
|
From: George Herold on 2 Mar 2010 22:21 On Mar 2, 9:39 pm, The Great Attractor <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:27:18 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > > > > > <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor > ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor > >> ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > >> >> >> (click link) > > >> >> >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > >> >> >> Enjoy, > > >> >> >> Fitz > > >> >> >Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. > > >> >> >George H. > > >> >> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >> >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? > > >> >> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the > >> >> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC > >> >> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply > >> >> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, > >> >> non-grammatical "No ones..." > > >> >"> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >> >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" > > >> >Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an > >> >experimentalist. > > >> >I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that > >> >it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed > >> >that? > > >> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe > >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > >Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it > >just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to > >find a monopole? > > >George H. > > So, this retarded puke doesn't believe in black holes, which we have > proven. Doesn't believe in dark matter or dark energy, which we have > proven is real. > > I think you claiming to be an observer only makes you not a scientist, > but a mere bystander, and you cannot even make very good observations at > doing that, or you would already be familiar with a whole world of things > that have been proven to be, despite being un-observervable at present. > > You are in an ELECTRONics group, dipshit! > > Have you ever seen an electron?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Wow!!! you're not nearly as enjoyable as Phil A. Did I really imply any of those things? Sorry about that. Ahh seen an electron? Well I've measured shot noise, does that count? George H.
From: Robert Baer on 2 Mar 2010 23:00 The Great Attractor wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:27:18 -0800 (PST), George Herold > <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor >> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >>>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >>>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >>>>>>> (click link) >>>>>>> http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >>>>>>> Enjoy, >>>>>>> Fitz >>>>>> Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >>>>>> George H. >>>>> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >>>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >>>>> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >>>>> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >>>>> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >>>>> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >>>>> non-grammatical "No ones..." >>>> "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >>>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >>>> Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an >>>> experimentalist. >>>> I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >>>> it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed >>>> that? >>> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >>> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >>> >>> - Show quoted text - >> Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it >> just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to >> find a monopole? >> >> George H. > > > So, this retarded puke doesn't believe in black holes, which we have > proven. Doesn't believe in dark matter or dark energy, which we have > proven is real. > > I think you claiming to be an observer only makes you not a scientist, > but a mere bystander, and you cannot even make very good observations at > doing that, or you would already be familiar with a whole world of things > that have been proven to be, despite being un-observervable at present. > > You are in an ELECTRONics group, dipshit! > > Have you ever seen an electron? Even Millikan did not see an electron, only the effects.
From: Robert Baer on 2 Mar 2010 23:02 George Herold wrote: > On Mar 2, 9:39 pm, The Great Attractor > <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:27:18 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor >>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >>>>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >>>>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >>>>>>>> (click link) >>>>>>>> http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >>>>>>>> Enjoy, >>>>>>>> Fitz >>>>>>> Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >>>>>>> George H. >>>>>> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >>>>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >>>>>> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >>>>>> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >>>>>> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >>>>>> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >>>>>> non-grammatical "No ones..." >>>>> "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >>>>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >>>>> Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an >>>>> experimentalist. >>>>> I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >>>>> it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed >>>>> that? >>>> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >>>> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text - >>> Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it >>> just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to >>> find a monopole? >>> George H. >> So, this retarded puke doesn't believe in black holes, which we have >> proven. Doesn't believe in dark matter or dark energy, which we have >> proven is real. >> >> I think you claiming to be an observer only makes you not a scientist, >> but a mere bystander, and you cannot even make very good observations at >> doing that, or you would already be familiar with a whole world of things >> that have been proven to be, despite being un-observervable at present. >> >> You are in an ELECTRONics group, dipshit! >> >> Have you ever seen an electron?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Wow!!! you're not nearly as enjoyable as Phil A. Did I really imply > any of those things? Sorry about that. > > Ahh seen an electron? Well I've measured shot noise, does that > count? > > George H. ....only if they came from a 12 GA double-barreled sawed-off accelerator.
From: George Herold on 2 Mar 2010 23:35 On Mar 2, 9:33 am, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSensel...(a)electrooptical.net> wrote: > On 3/2/2010 9:27 AM, George Herold wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor > > <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor > >>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > >>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz<zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > >>>>>> (click link) > > >>>>>>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > >>>>>> Enjoy, > > >>>>>> Fitz > > >>>>> Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. > > >>>>> George H. > > >>>> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? > > >>>> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the > >>>> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC > >>>> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply > >>>> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, > >>>> non-grammatical "No ones..." > > >>> "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" > > >>> Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an > >>> experimentalist. > > >>> I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that > >>> it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed > >>> that? > > >> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe > >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it > > just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to > > find a monopole? > > > George H. > > Slartibartfast said it best: > > "The chances of finding out what's really going on in the universe are > so remote, the only thing to do is hang the sense of it and keep > yourself occupied. Look at me, I design fjords. I'd far rather be happy > than right any day." > "And are you?" > "No, that's where it all falls apart I'm afraid." > "Pity, it sounded like quite a nice lifestyle otherwise." > > Cheers > > Phil Hobbs > > -- > Dr Philip C D Hobbs > Principal > ElectroOptical Innovations > 55 Orchard Rd > Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 > 845-480-2058 > hobbs at electrooptical dot nethttp://electrooptical.net- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Thanks for that Phil, I like it. I feel the same way about God. (Im a staunch agnostic. And I attend our UU church semi-regularly.) The fundamentalist on each side bother me. How can someone be so sure either way. And what does it really matter anyway. How can the existence or non-existence of God change what is the more important question, how to live ones life? George H. Sorry to get all religousy there . But the thread was already OT.
From: The Great Attractor on 3 Mar 2010 06:17
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:21:12 -0800 (PST), George Herold <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 2, 9:39�pm, The Great Attractor ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:27:18 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Mar 2, 7:31�am, The Great Attractor >> ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >> >> ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >> >> >> >> >> (click link) >> >> >> >> >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >> >> >> >> >> Enjoy, >> >> >> >> >> Fitz >> >> >> >> >Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >> >> >> >> >George H. >> >> >> >> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> >> >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >> >> >> >> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >> >> >> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >> >> >> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >> >> >> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >> >> >> non-grammatical "No ones..." >> >> >> >"> � Sure they have. �What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> >> >> � What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >> >> >> >Dang, No idea about either. �But do you have any data? �I'm an >> >> >experimentalist. >> >> >> >I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >> >> >it would explain why charge is quantized. �Was it Dirac that showed >> >> >that? >> >> >> � What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >> >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >Then who cares? �If we can't observe or understand something, then it >> >just doesn't much matter to me. �How 'bout building an apparatus to >> >find a monopole? >> >> >George H. >> >> �So, this retarded puke doesn't believe in black holes, which we have >> proven. �Doesn't believe in dark matter or dark energy, which we have >> proven is real. >> >> � I think you claiming to be an observer only makes you not a scientist, >> but a mere bystander, and you cannot even make very good observations at >> doing that, or you would already be familiar with a whole world of things >> that have been proven to be, despite being un-observervable at present. >> >> � You are in an ELECTRONics group, dipshit! >> >> � Have you ever seen an electron?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Wow!!! you're not nearly as enjoyable as Phil A. Did I really imply >any of those things? Sorry about that. > >Ahh seen an electron? Well I've measured shot noise, does that >count? > >George H. OK, you are allowed back out of the barrel. |