Magnetism is really -- WHAT?
in [Design]
|
From: The Great Attractor on 2 Mar 2010 07:31 On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 1, 9:38�pm, The Great Attractor ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Mar 1, 12:06�am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >> >> >> (click link) >> >> >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >> >> >> Enjoy, >> >> >> Fitz >> >> >Moving charge. �No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >> >> >George H. >> >> � Sure they have. �What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> � What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >> >> � The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >> field makeup of a monopole source. �At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. �How hard could it have been to simply >> have written "No one has..." �instead of that non linguistic, >> non-grammatical "No ones..." > >"> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" > >Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an >experimentalist. > >I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed >that? > What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?
From: George Herold on 2 Mar 2010 09:27 On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > > > > > <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor > ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold > > >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? > > >> >> (click link) > > >> >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > >> >> Enjoy, > > >> >> Fitz > > >> >Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. > > >> >George H. > > >> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? > > >> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the > >> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC > >> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply > >> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, > >> non-grammatical "No ones..." > > >"> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? > > >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" > > >Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an > >experimentalist. > > >I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that > >it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed > >that? > > What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe > which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to find a monopole? George H.
From: Phil Hobbs on 2 Mar 2010 09:33 On 3/2/2010 9:27 AM, George Herold wrote: > On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor > <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz<zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >> >>>>>> (click link) >> >>>>>> http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >> >>>>>> Enjoy, >> >>>>>> Fitz >> >>>>> Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >> >>>>> George H. >> >>>> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >> >>>> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >>>> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >>>> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >>>> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >>>> non-grammatical "No ones..." >> >>> "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >> >>> Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an >>> experimentalist. >> >>> I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >>> it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed >>> that? >> >> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it > just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to > find a monopole? > > George H. Slartibartfast said it best: "The chances of finding out what's really going on in the universe are so remote, the only thing to do is hang the sense of it and keep yourself occupied. Look at me, I design fjords. I'd far rather be happy than right any day." "And are you?" "No, that's where it all falls apart I'm afraid." "Pity, it sounded like quite a nice lifestyle otherwise." Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
From: Phil Hobbs on 2 Mar 2010 09:33 On 3/2/2010 9:27 AM, George Herold wrote: > On Mar 2, 7:31 am, The Great Attractor > <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >>> <Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >>>> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz<zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >> >>>>>> (click link) >> >>>>>> http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >> >>>>>> Enjoy, >> >>>>>> Fitz >> >>>>> Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >> >>>>> George H. >> >>>> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >> >>>> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >>>> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >>>> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >>>> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >>>> non-grammatical "No ones..." >> >>> "> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >>>> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >> >>> Dang, No idea about either. But do you have any data? I'm an >>> experimentalist. >> >>> I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >>> it would explain why charge is quantized. Was it Dirac that showed >>> that? >> >> What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it > just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to > find a monopole? > > George H. Slartibartfast said it best: "The chances of finding out what's really going on in the universe are so remote, the only thing to do is hang the sense of it and keep yourself occupied. Look at me, I design fjords. I'd far rather be happy than right any day." "And are you?" "No, that's where it all falls apart I'm afraid." "Pity, it sounded like quite a good lifestyle otherwise." Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
From: The Great Attractor on 2 Mar 2010 21:39
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:27:18 -0800 (PST), George Herold <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 2, 7:31�am, The Great Attractor ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:58:00 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Mar 1, 9:38 pm, The Great Attractor >> ><Sup...(a)ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 06:49:35 -0800 (PST), George Herold >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Mar 1, 12:06 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> Magnetism is really -- WHAT? >> >> >> >> (click link) >> >> >> >>http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm >> >> >> >> Enjoy, >> >> >> >> Fitz >> >> >> >Moving charge. No ones found any magnetic monopoles. >> >> >> >George H. >> >> >> Sure they have. What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> >> What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses? >> >> >> The really funny thing is that I wrote a paper in '72 at 12 yo on the >> >> field makeup of a monopole source. At 12, my favorite book was The CRC >> >> Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. How hard could it have been to simply >> >> have written "No one has..." instead of that non linguistic, >> >> non-grammatical "No ones..." >> >> >"> � Sure they have. �What do you think the pre-bang singularity was? >> >> >> � What polarity do you think that a black hole possesses?" >> >> >Dang, No idea about either. �But do you have any data? �I'm an >> >experimentalist. >> >> >I have heard that if there's just one monopole in the universe, that >> >it would explain why charge is quantized. �Was it Dirac that showed >> >that? >> >> � What if our universe is merely a 'bubble' inside a much larger universe >> which is beyond our capacity to observe, much less understand?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Then who cares? If we can't observe or understand something, then it >just doesn't much matter to me. How 'bout building an apparatus to >find a monopole? > >George H. So, this retarded puke doesn't believe in black holes, which we have proven. Doesn't believe in dark matter or dark energy, which we have proven is real. I think you claiming to be an observer only makes you not a scientist, but a mere bystander, and you cannot even make very good observations at doing that, or you would already be familiar with a whole world of things that have been proven to be, despite being un-observervable at present. You are in an ELECTRONics group, dipshit! Have you ever seen an electron? |