From: Tim Williams on
"Chris" <christofire(a)talktalk.net> wrote in message
news:9f794283-f986-4e41-93af-5600bd2dbe34(a)z26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> Those are all about 1 tesla according to their table at
> http://www.supermagnete.nl/eng/data_table.php, which seems typical for
> Neodymium (-Iron-Boron) magnets, and those are 'the strongest magnets
> in the world' according to that web site!
>
> Tesla is the unit of flux density. The number around 40 is an 'energy
> product' apparently: the square of B, in Tesla, divided by mu0 for
> air, although the unit MegaGaussOersted must involve a strange
> conversion.

The type 50M shows a particularly high remenance of 1.40-1.46T, from a
magnetization of 860-995kA/m (which means, for a 1 cm thick magnet in a
steel fixture, you need to pulse about 10kAt around it -- 100A * 100 turns
let's say!).

Assuming the B-H curve is exactly that square, the "energy product" is:
1.4527M T*A/m = Wb*A/m^3 = V*s*A/m^3 = J/m^3.

(Webers are volt-seconds, the amount of flux applied. Volts get into it
because integrating EMF over time gives flux, hence, V*s. Flux actually has
nothing to do with amps, which sounds funny for magnetism which is all about
amps, but it's like how current and voltage are dependent on resistance,
there's a connection, it's just not a direct connection.)

> I wonder if it's significant that I ordered an even number?! Perhaps
> if you order three, they send you a fourth one free of charge!

But then you'd have to magnetize it yourself! <rimshot>

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Tim Williams on
"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP(a)interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote in message
news:lh58n5tms6k40duke11c1o2n4fl9neevpo(a)4ax.com...
> The 400-series (ferritic) stainlesses are quite ferromagnetic- you can
> pick up big chunks with an electromagnet.

300 series stainlesses (304 and 316 are the most common) are slightly
magnetic, more so when work hardened. A flat panel of 316 might not be
particularly magnetic, but a sharp bend in the same sheet may be sticky
enough to hold a light magnet.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:50:45 -0600) it happened "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote in <hl190l$8ft$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>:

>"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP(a)interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote in message
>news:jl58n5ldh993a68e3hb7jr83usr874a5be(a)4ax.com...
>> If you feel like experimenting, it would be interesting to see if a
>> BFM (big fat magnet) would kill an energized SMPS wall wart.
>
>Hmm, depending on orientation, it might enhance efficiency.
>
>Tim

Core saturation would _enhance_ efficiency?
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on
Tim Williams wrote:
> "Chris" <christofire(a)talktalk.net> wrote in message
> news:9f794283-f986-4e41-93af-5600bd2dbe34(a)z26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> Those are all about 1 tesla according to their table at
>> http://www.supermagnete.nl/eng/data_table.php, which seems typical for
>> Neodymium (-Iron-Boron) magnets, and those are 'the strongest magnets
>> in the world' according to that web site!
>>
>> Tesla is the unit of flux density. The number around 40 is an 'energy
>> product' apparently: the square of B, in Tesla, divided by mu0 for
>> air, although the unit MegaGaussOersted must involve a strange
>> conversion.
>
> The type 50M shows a particularly high remenance of 1.40-1.46T, from a
> magnetization of 860-995kA/m (which means, for a 1 cm thick magnet in a
> steel fixture, you need to pulse about 10kAt around it -- 100A * 100 turns
> let's say!).
>
> Assuming the B-H curve is exactly that square, the "energy product" is:
> 1.4527M T*A/m = Wb*A/m^3 = V*s*A/m^3 = J/m^3.
>
> (Webers are volt-seconds, the amount of flux applied. Volts get into it
> because integrating EMF over time gives flux, hence, V*s. Flux actually has
> nothing to do with amps, which sounds funny for magnetism which is all about
> amps, but it's like how current and voltage are dependent on resistance,
> there's a connection, it's just not a direct connection.)
>
>> I wonder if it's significant that I ordered an even number?! Perhaps
>> if you order three, they send you a fourth one free of charge!
>
> But then you'd have to magnetize it yourself! <rimshot>
>
> Tim
>

I've known people stick floppy discs to filing cabinets with magnets.
No harm done apparently

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:20:24 +0800) it happened "Royston Vasey"
<royston(a)vasey.com> wrote in
<rtSdnVRqufGHmenWnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au>:

>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:hl0uf3$u1m$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>> On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:45:06 -0500) it happened legg
>> <legg(a)nospam.magma.ca> wrote in
>> <gcr7n51ah8qfbeugdfhsviqggptlkukt9q(a)4ax.com>:
>>
>>>On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:09:08 GMT, Jan Panteltje
>>><pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Just got myself some small magnets, these are not very strong,
>>>>specified as about 1.2 Tesla IIRC, but anyways,
>>>>had to take some stuff apart, and had them on the work bench.
>>>>Normally screws are all over the place, but with these magnets everything
>>>>just jumped to it :-)
>>>>Very easy, also used the magnets to magnetise my screwdrivers...
>>>>Works much easier.
>>>
>>>Magnetized tools can make manual smd placement a nightmare.
>>>
>>>RL
>>
>
>
>> I just tried the magnets on some 5.6 and 10 pF SMD caps, and they do not
>> stick?
>
>
>
>I had some cheap s/steel tweezers, they got magnetised and would pull 805
>resistors around.

I just tried a strip of SMD zeners, those are attracted indeed!