Prev: What is this software?
Next: A little help please
From: Compfix on 12 Sep 2006 15:41 "Kerry Brown" <kerry(a)kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message news:ADzNg.531001$Mn5.431511(a)pd7tw3no... > Compfix wrote: >> I found an odd entry in my registry of 'Pocket soft' which referred >> to 2 dll files patch32w.dll and pw32a.dll, both of which were in my >> windows directory as opposed to the normal location for dll files. Has >> anyone got any ideas what these are for and if they are malware >> or virus. >> Bob > > Pocket Soft has been around for years. > > http://www.pocketsoft.com/ > > I remember using rtpatch with Clipper a dBase compiler from the DOS days. > They are a legitimate company. Some game companies use their products to > update their games without a reinstall. If the files are from Pocket Soft > they are OK. What does your anti-malware software say when you scan them? > > -- > Kerry Brown > I have scanned with fully updated spybot, adaware, cwshredder and sophos AV and none of them report anything. Bob
From: Tony on 12 Sep 2006 17:07 Kerry Brown wrote: > Compfix wrote: > > I found an odd entry in my registry of 'Pocket soft' which referred > > to 2 dll files patch32w.dll and pw32a.dll, both of which were in my > > windows directory as opposed to the normal location for dll files. Has > > anyone got any ideas what these are for and if they are malware > > or virus. > > Bob > > Pocket Soft has been around for years. > > http://www.pocketsoft.com/ > > I remember using rtpatch with Clipper a dBase compiler from the DOS days. > They are a legitimate company. Some game companies use their products to > update their games without a reinstall. If the files are from Pocket Soft > they are OK. What does your anti-malware software say when you scan them? > > -- > Kerry Brown Bob, Patches made by RTPatch (which does indeed date back to DOS days in 1991) are being distributed by game companies as well as just about every other type of medium-to-large business, and a large number of government users as well. pw32a.dll is used for Microsoft's Windows Installer (MSI) style patches, whereas patchw32.dll is for non-MSI style patches. If you've downloaded a patch in the past 15 years, chances are you've used RTPatch before. In fact, the odds are pretty good that you're getting RTPatch patches on a semi-regular basis from a number of sources. It's "behind the scenes" in many large scale software distribution updates. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to use the contact page on our site to get in touch with an engineer. Regards, Tony O- Pocket Soft, Inc. www.pocketsoft.com
From: Compfix on 13 Sep 2006 15:18
"Tony" <tolivero(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1158095260.566041.174200(a)i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > Kerry Brown wrote: >> Compfix wrote: >> > I found an odd entry in my registry of 'Pocket soft' which referred >> > to 2 dll files patch32w.dll and pw32a.dll, both of which were in my >> > windows directory as opposed to the normal location for dll files. Has >> > anyone got any ideas what these are for and if they are malware >> > or virus. >> > Bob >> >> Pocket Soft has been around for years. >> >> http://www.pocketsoft.com/ >> >> I remember using rtpatch with Clipper a dBase compiler from the DOS days. >> They are a legitimate company. Some game companies use their products to >> update their games without a reinstall. If the files are from Pocket Soft >> they are OK. What does your anti-malware software say when you scan them? >> >> -- >> Kerry Brown > > Bob, > > Patches made by RTPatch (which does indeed date back to DOS days in > 1991) are being distributed by game companies as well as just about > every other type of medium-to-large business, and a large number of > government users as well. pw32a.dll is used for Microsoft's Windows > Installer (MSI) style patches, whereas patchw32.dll is for non-MSI > style patches. > > If you've downloaded a patch in the past 15 years, chances are you've > used RTPatch before. In fact, the odds are pretty good that you're > getting RTPatch patches on a semi-regular basis from a number of > sources. It's "behind the scenes" in many large scale software > distribution updates. > > If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to use the contact > page on our site to get in touch with an engineer. > > Regards, > > Tony O- > Pocket Soft, Inc. > www.pocketsoft.com > Thanks for that Tony. I was just a bit concerned as they only appeared on 1 pc on the network. I noticed the Pocketsoft entry when I was checking some registry settings. If they are related to MS downloads, then I suppose it could be office 2007 or Vista beta programs which were downloaded to try on the PC in question - although the files were dated 2004 :-) . Bob |