Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.45 released
in [Spyware]
|
From: Jenn on 4 Apr 2010 17:24 "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9D50B029EE9E2HHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250... > "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in > news:hpav2s$3dg$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9D50ABF84E97DHHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250... >> >>> I'm capable of civil discussion with anyone who wants the discussion >>> to be civil. At the same time, I'm capable of responding in kind to >>> those who do not want a civil discussion and aim for lame attacks. >>> <snip> >> >> The next step in anyones communication skillset would be the ability >> to have civil discussion with anyone despite how they respond. >> <wink> ;) > > People are treated as they wish to be treated. I think everyone wants to be treated well....... some people it's difficult to understand why they are aggressive or mean, tho. > I give everyone the > benefit of the doubt once, I guess I give people more than one chance, and generally over a long period of time. > unless the individual already made it clear > that civil correspondense isn't on the agenda (re: Toxic). I've met people like that too... I don't know (toxic) so I'm not referring to him specifically. > David will > even tell you I was polite and very civil with his email correspondence > until his questions went beyond support for BugHunter. I remember you two being friendly in discussions on my bbs. > As he is often > doing here, his questions were about other individuals and I wouldn't > discuss them with him. yes... that is part of how he investigates various people and issues. > We haven't been friends (heh) since then. He says > I became a whitehat Whats that mean .. to become *whitehat*? > and got too busy with malwarebytes to help him > further. That isn't the truth. The truth was I wasn't going to answer > questions about people or anything that wasn't specifically and only > about BugHunter; that annoyed him. He's been trying to dig up dirt on me > ever since. :) Again.. it's those unanswered questions that but Dave. :) > The guys a nutjob. naaaaaa ... he's just persistant. :D -- Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: Dustin Cook on 4 Apr 2010 17:31 "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in news:hpb02q$9nk$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9D50B029EE9E2HHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250... >> "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in >> news:hpav2s$3dg$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: >> >>> "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9D50ABF84E97DHHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250... >>> >>>> I'm capable of civil discussion with anyone who wants the >>>> discussion to be civil. At the same time, I'm capable of responding >>>> in kind to those who do not want a civil discussion and aim for >>>> lame attacks. <snip> >>> >>> The next step in anyones communication skillset would be the ability >>> to have civil discussion with anyone despite how they respond. >>> <wink> ;) >> >> People are treated as they wish to be treated. > > I think everyone wants to be treated well....... some people it's > difficult to understand why they are aggressive or mean, tho. > >> I give everyone the >> benefit of the doubt once, > > I guess I give people more than one chance, and generally over a long > period of time. > >> unless the individual already made it clear >> that civil correspondense isn't on the agenda (re: Toxic). > > I've met people like that too... I don't know (toxic) so I'm not > referring to him specifically. > >> David will >> even tell you I was polite and very civil with his email >> correspondence until his questions went beyond support for BugHunter. > > I remember you two being friendly in discussions on my bbs. > >> As he is often >> doing here, his questions were about other individuals and I wouldn't >> discuss them with him. > > yes... that is part of how he investigates various people and issues. Well, You have to understand in this line of work, it's best that if someone has a question or wants to know why such and such did such and such, it's best to ask them directly. It's considered bad practice to discuss private matters with outsiders. >> We haven't been friends (heh) since then. He says >> I became a whitehat > > Whats that mean .. to become *whitehat*? Whitehat=good hacker/reformed hacker Blackhat=bad hacker/the kind movies are made about... >> and got too busy with malwarebytes to help him >> further. That isn't the truth. The truth was I wasn't going to answer >> questions about people or anything that wasn't specifically and only >> about BugHunter; that annoyed him. He's been trying to dig up dirt on >> me ever since. :) > > Again.. it's those unanswered questions that but Dave. :) They aren't for me to answer. :) -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: Jenn on 4 Apr 2010 17:46 "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9D50B37576AA4HHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.250... > "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in >> yes... that is part of how he investigates various people and issues. > > Well, You have to understand in this line of work, it's best that if > someone has a question or wants to know why such and such did such and > such, it's best to ask them directly. It's considered bad practice to > discuss private matters with outsiders. I understand ... >>> We haven't been friends (heh) since then. He says >>> I became a whitehat >> >> Whats that mean .. to become *whitehat*? > Whitehat=good hacker/reformed hacker > Blackhat=bad hacker/the kind movies are made about... ahh.. so it's a good thing when someone says you're a whitehat now? LOL cool >>> and got too busy with malwarebytes to help him >>> further. That isn't the truth. The truth was I wasn't going to answer >>> questions about people or anything that wasn't specifically and only >>> about BugHunter; that annoyed him. He's been trying to dig up dirt on >>> me ever since. :) >> >> Again.. it's those unanswered questions that but Dave. :) > They aren't for me to answer. :) Well ... my hope is that you guys will eventually work out your disagreements. ya know? -- Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: Leythos on 4 Apr 2010 17:46 In article <hparni$c3n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday says... > Again ... calling someone a troll is the lazy way of interacting with > anyone. If you or I can understand why people do what they do and say what > they say and gain understanding of those things, (which takes an effort and > some time,) there would be no need to label anyone as a troll. > Jenn, I'm sorry, but you're wrong. You seem to think that trolls are just labeled that because people, even everyone, disagrees with them, but that's not the case. A troll disrupts by many means, sometimes subtle and not always argumentative.... I have many people that I/we disagree with on many subjects and don't consider them trolls - just look at politics. The difference between someone you disagree with and a troll is that the troll doesn't care about the conversation or validity, they keep twisting, like BD does. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Leythos on 4 Apr 2010 17:48
In article <hpasg9$h4p$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday says... > I should let you know that I'm not taking up for Dave. I'm just explaining > that I understand him and why he does what he does and says the things he > says. > Jenn, how do you know you're not mistaken and fooled? -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address) |