Math

JSH: 11 years later and still the same old thing
"jon" <invalid(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:hvcan1$ekv$2(a)news.albasani.net... So 11 years ago JSH was whining; Based on all the evidence I have before me now, I feel confident in concluding that I have a proof. Sci.math has played its role well as always. # posted by James Harr... 17 Jun 2010 15:39

a question about posing questions on sci.math
Hi, I often want to ask questions on this group from what I'm currently reading (both physical textbooks and online documents) but I'm put off by the amount of math symbols and notation I would have to transfer to this plain text environment just to pose a small question. Would it be okay to refer to previews ... 17 Jun 2010 12:18

As I watched the Plower Plowing
As I watched the Plower Plowing Pensive and Faltering Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking A Word Out of the Sea. Out of the rocked cradle. Out of the boy’s mother’s womb, and from the nipples of her breasts. When the lilac-scent was in the air If we two but keep together. O trembling throat! Murmur! murmur on!... 17 Jun 2010 07:52

CANTORS DIFFERENT PROOF!
CANTORS DIFFERENT PROOF! Definition: digit 1 is different, and digit 2 is different, and digit 3 is different, ... Proof: digit 1 is different, and digit 2 is different, and digit 3 is different, ... Therefore it's a different number! Herc -- "And God posted an angel with a flaming sword at the gates of Cant... 17 Jun 2010 07:52

Seeds for squares sums equalities
Bonjour, It seems easy to generate 'squares' equalities. Just starting with positive integer terms: 2^2+3^2 = 13 = 1*13=(7-6)(7+6) So 2^2+3^2+6^2 = 7^2 (1) 1^2+4^2+7^2 = 66 (2) =1*66=2*33=3*22=6*11 no product of same parity 3^2+5^2+9^2+11^2 = 236 ... 17 Jun 2010 06:47

P equals NP is resolved by building a simple bridge over the integers.
Let P equal a set of integers and let NP be any number greater than 1 including 1. Then P equals NP because the integers and each subset of integers equals numbers greater than 1 and including 1. Q.E.D. Why am I right? Why am I not wrong? ... 18 Jun 2010 15:45

Baby L on M other of all Prostitutes
@ECHO ECHO ECHO Hello World! @ECHO ECHO Hello Universe! @EcHO ECHO P = NP Quod Erat Demonstrandum! (C) 2009.http://meami.org @\windows\ie7\iexplore.exe meami.org @"c:\program files\internet exploder\ iexplore.exe 'http://www.meami.org'" @open http:\\www.meami.org" #include <windows.h> void main... 17 Jun 2010 05:42

CANTOR'S TWO PROOFS
CANTOR'S POWER PROOF! Superinfinity is based on the circular reasoning "no box contains the box numbers that don't contain their own box number". No I don't like it either but there is a new sequence because we *construct* it like so: CANTORS DIFFERENT PROOF! Defn: digit 1 is different, and digit 2 is differe... 19 Jun 2010 18:55

Retiring from the fray
"MichaelW" <msjmb(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:adfcc161-d1bb-4142-8153-9965e14e41bb(a)e34g2000pra.googlegroups.com... Assuming anyone cares... Just before JSH announced his sabbatical I was ready to retire from all JSH threads and now that he has returned it is time for me to formally retire from ... 16 Jun 2010 22:09

Skew-symmetric matrix representation
Hi, Given a skew-symmetric real (n x n)-matrix A, and a real orthogonal (n x n)-matrix Q, is it possible to find a real (n x n)-matrix B such that: A = Q^T B - B^T Q ? -- http://kaba.hilvi.org ... 17 Jun 2010 23:23