Math

deriving speed of light out of raw pure math Chapt 19 #207; ATOM TOTALITY
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudosphere http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractrix Now if you look at those two figures from Wikipedia of Pseudosphere and Tractrix that I have to retrieve these numbers: 60,000 x 60,000/ 12,000 = 300,000 50,000 x 50,000 / 8,300 = 300,000 40,000 x 40,000/ 5,300 = 300,000 3... 28 Jun 2010 22:46

FERMATISTS -- HERE IS WHY INFINITY VALUE IS (000.) Decimal point on the left is prime!
Numbers don't have decimals, imbecile. "Inverse 19 mathematics" <hope9900(a)verizon.net> wrote in message news:f7bb045b-601d-4ec8-8672-041982a0c6d2(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... ... 27 Jun 2010 23:46

How to iterate a function in Maple?
Hi! Would someone please show me how to iterate a function in Maple. Respectfully, Robert Kaufman ... 29 Jun 2010 09:39

Haldeman-Ramanujan quintuplets
Hello all, A Haldeman-Ramanujan quintuplet {a,b,c,d,e} solves the system, a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+e^2 = x^2 a^4+b^4+c^4+d^4+e^4 = y^4 The smallest is, 2^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+4^2 = 7^2 2^4+2^4+3^4+4^4+4^4 = 5^4 This in fact can be given a polynomial soln. It is also possible that a = 0, though only one is known. Se... 27 Jun 2010 19:25

deriving speed of light out of raw pure math Chapt 19 #206; ATOM TOTALITY
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: What a difference a shower can make on coming up with solutions. Earlier tonight I was gloomy at the deadend I was running into. But I managed to overcome those pitfalls. I want two features for the speed of light and I feel with them, I am on the path of truth. (... 27 Jun 2010 17:12

proper analysis of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes rather than the botched job of Hardy/Woodgold and Mathematical Intelligencer #607 Correcting Math
> [0] Michael *Hardy* and Catherine Woodgold, "*Prime* *Simplicity*",  *Mathematical Intelligencer<https://mail.google.com/wiki/ Mathematical_Intelligencer> First off, let me apologize to Catherine Woodgold, for I mistakenly somehow typed in Moongold and that word seemed to have electronically increased... 27 Jun 2010 22:41

HISTORIC SPECIFIC MATHEMATICAL PROOF AGAINST CURRENT MATHEMATICS GIVEN TO PROFESSOR EDDIE ESCULTURA BELOW
MATHEMATICS IS DIVERGENT AT 1/3 (1/6+1/6). It is simple but most of you Fermatists are so stupid that there has been only one of your smartest Mathematician who has acknowledged Tan 19 . Even he is still in Love with Fermatists. He is Prof Edgar Escultura PHD , Madison Wisconsin. HERE PROFESSOR ESCULTURA ... 28 Jun 2010 03:02

Laws of large numbers
Hello All, can anyone recommend a monograph dealing with more or less recent results about laws of large numbers? (I already have Petrov's "Limit theorems for sums of independent random variables"). Thanks in advance. Best wishes, Evgeny. ... 27 Jun 2010 16:06

interpretation of divergence
This is from Rogawski's text: "let's assume that F is the velocity field of a fluid. Then the flux of F through a surface S is the volume of fluid passing through S per unit time. Suppose that S encloses a region W containing a point P(e.g., a ball of small radius). Then div(F) is nearly constant on W with v... 27 Jun 2010 15:01

How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA is Consistent (EASY PROOF)
Transfer Principle (lwalke3(a)lausd.net) writes: On Jun 26, 7:51=A0pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: On 2010-06-26, R. Srinivasan <sradh...(a)in.ibm.com> wrote: The theory ZF-Inf+~Inf clearly proves ~Inf ("Infinite sets do not exist"). Actually ~Inf does not assert "Infinite sets do not... 29 Jun 2010 22:54