Prev: ISOBuddy v1.01
Next: [UPDATE] VLC Media Player 1.1.0
From: Mike Easter on 23 Jun 2010 09:44 Saxman wrote: > That's an extremely good review. Pity it will not allow me to connect > to 'The Great Software List' hyperlink at the bottom of the article. > The Wayback Machine has many versions of that website from 2004 to 2008 ranging from 17 pages up to 72 pages back down to 12 pages. He has certainly reviewed a lot of software and gotten kudos for those reviews. -- Mike Easter
From: Ron on 23 Jun 2010 12:07 On 6/23/2010 6:44 AM, Mike Easter wrote: > Saxman wrote: > >> That's an extremely good review. Pity it will not allow me to connect >> to 'The Great Software List' hyperlink at the bottom of the article. >> > The Wayback Machine has many versions of that website from 2004 to 2008 > ranging from 17 pages up to 72 pages back down to 12 pages. > > He has certainly reviewed a lot of software and gotten kudos for those > reviews. > Oh ye of little faith... (vbg) The blog's still somewhat active: http://www.thegsblog.com/ Ron Moore
From: Ron on 23 Jun 2010 12:15 On 6/23/2010 9:07 AM, Ron wrote: > On 6/23/2010 6:44 AM, Mike Easter wrote: >> Saxman wrote: >> >>> That's an extremely good review. Pity it will not allow me to connect >>> to 'The Great Software List' hyperlink at the bottom of the article. >>> >> The Wayback Machine has many versions of that website from 2004 to 2008 >> ranging from 17 pages up to 72 pages back down to 12 pages. >> >> He has certainly reviewed a lot of software and gotten kudos for those >> reviews. >> > > Oh ye of little faith... (vbg) > The blog's still somewhat active: > http://www.thegsblog.com/ > > Ron Moore Decided to check DC's site and found this: http://donationcoder.com/blog/ hth
From: s|b on 23 Jun 2010 13:35 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:49:00 +0100, Saxman wrote: > > I recommend that you choose a better Subject next time... > ....you don't like Microsoft? I only like them when I don't have to pay for their software. |-) -- s|b
From: Dave Doe on 24 Jun 2010 01:26
In article <hvri60$4b0$7(a)news.eternal-september.org>, F.Reeware2010 @invalid.invalid says... > > Saxman <john.h.williams(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > > > The beta version is free. > > Mr Saxman, Microsoft Office is not free software. How much does the beta version cost? -- Duncan. |