From: Jolly Roger on
In article <hvbm50$mjc$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote:

> On 06-16-2010 17:43, John McWilliams wrote:
> > TaliesinSoft wrote:
> >> I just now received an email, supposedly from Apple, that asserts that
> >> my MobileMe account will be suspended for 48 hours unless I respond to
> >> the mail by clicking on a URL and then updating my account
> >> information, er uh credit card and such. I would suggest that anyone
> >> else receiving the message also ignore it.
> >
> > For amusement, I sometimes click through and enter information. Bogus,
> > of course, the idea being to make them waste time thinking they've got a
> > 'hot one'.....
> >
> > Anyone else do this, and is there a real downside?
>
> Call your card provider and ask for one of the fake numbers they use
> to catch crooks, then put that in with its associated billing address
> and all.

Good idea. : )

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Richard Maine on
David Empson <dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz> wrote:

> If the crook can buy something online without the validation code, then
> a picture of the front of the card is sufficient.
>
> They probably need the validation code, so they'd have to take a picture
> of the back of the card.
>
> Some online merchants also ask for the billing address, which isn't on
> the card. They'd have to get into a greater degree of ID theft for that.

That's all for if you are trying to buy something with it as a consumer.
If you manage to get a merchant account yourself, you don't need any of
that stuff. I've had a merchant account, so I know.

The bank won't reject a charge because the validation code or address is
wrong. At most, it just warns the merchant about the mismatch and then
leaves it up to the merchant whether to go ahead with the charge or not.
Anyway, that's the my merchant accounts (both of the 2 I had at
different times) were.

Most of that is required by the particular merchant rather than by the
underlying credit card system, and it is to help protect the legit
merchants from chargebacks. Legit merchants *REALLY* don't want
chargebacks; they hurt a lot. Not only does a chargeback return the
money for the individual transaction, but there are extra fees and if
you get enough of them, your account is likely to get terminated.

If you are a scammer who has gotten a merchant account, you don't care
about all that. You'll take your money and run before things fall down.

Of course, there are safeguards in the process of getting a merchant
account, but it isn't as if it is inherently difficult. All you need is
the one suitably done fake identity as a merchant; you don't need an ID
for each credit card number you try to drain.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgment.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
From: d4g4h4 on
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft(a)me.com> wrote:

> I just now received an email, supposedly from Apple, that asserts that
> my MobileMe account will be suspended for 48 hours unless I respond to
> the mail by clicking on a URL and then updating my account information,
> er uh credit card and such. I would suggest that anyone else receiving
> the message also ignore it.

Was it sent to your mobileme email address?

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
www.davidhorne.net (email address on website)
"[Do you think the world learned anything from the first
world war?] No. They never learn." -Harry Patch (1898-2009)
From: Wes Groleau on
On 06-16-2010 20:03, David Empson wrote:
> The card number is no use by itself: at a minimum they would also need
> the name on the card and the expiry date. For most online purchase
> situations they also need the three digit validation code printed on the
> back of card (not embossed, and it is randomly generated each time you
> are issued a new card).

Oh, I thought he was talking about the validation code.

--
Wes Groleau

He that is good for making excuses, is seldom good for anything else.
-- Benjamin Franklin
From: nospam on
In article <hvbmdb$nve$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Wes Groleau
<Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote:

> > of theirs. If you don't at least go to the trouble of making your credit
> > card number "checksum" right (there's an algorithm for that, which isn't
> > hard to find, but I didn't bother to do so for this posting), I'd guess
>
> I find that hard to believe. The sensible thing for a card provider to
> do would be to associate each account with a _random_ check number.

it's true, but there is an additional 3 digit cvv code on the back of
the card so even if you can hack the number on the front, you still
have some additional work to do.

> If the number can be obtained by an easy-to-find algorithm, then
> any crook that sees the account number could use it on-line.

in addition to the number, you need the cvv code, the owner's name and
usually his/her address.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Top 10 iPhone apps
Next: 10.6.4 install FAIL RESOLVED