Monitors slowly evolving
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Superzoom P&S's may have long "effective" focal lengths, but....
Next: What is the point of having 16 bit colour if a computer monitor can only display 8 bit colour? How do you edit 16 bit colour when you can only see 8 bit?
From: LOL! on 11 Jul 2010 01:27 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:14:37 +1200, Me <user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >On 11/07/2010 5:03 p.m., LOL! wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:32:06 +1200, Me<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Oh - forgot to say this was taken with a P&S. Shutter speed was way too >>> slow to freeze motion blur. >> >> Oh, I forgot to say, this was also shot with a superzoom compact camera >> during sunset. >> >> http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4081/4782164878_56285b02f4_b.jpg >> >> You're pretty lousy at knowing how to use any camera, aren't you. Thanks >> for proving that to the whole world. >> >You got lucky. Luck has absolutely nothing to do with it. I have about 10,000 more of the same genre. >I posed my dog for the shot, sitting still, then pressed the shutter >button. By the time the shutter went off, she'd stood up and had >started wagging her tail. >I suppose with your bird shot, it was much the same... I suppose you are wrong. The one where it was just lifting from the water wasn't as interesting as this one with the drops of water trailing it in the air. I would also suppose you are an untalented and unskilled idiot, but I already know you are an untalented and unskilled idiot by your own proof, so I won't suppose that. LOL!
From: Bruce on 11 Jul 2010 05:29 On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml Monitors slowly evolving? No, you missed the point as usual, Rich. What we have here is Michael Reichmann *rapidly* evolving into a shill for Eizo monitors! Is there *any* item of imaging equipment that Reichmann would refuse to shill for on his "Ludicrous Landscape" site? No answer sought or needed. ;-)
From: R. Mark Clayton on 11 Jul 2010 07:15 "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:2f86bcbe-1145-4e89-a69a-bb6a5d4f9bf7(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml > More colours than the human eye can discern? Why pay for that?
From: Me on 11 Jul 2010 07:26 On 11/07/2010 5:27 p.m., LOL! wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:14:37 +1200, Me<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: > >> On 11/07/2010 5:03 p.m., LOL! wrote: >>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:32:06 +1200, Me<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Oh - forgot to say this was taken with a P&S. Shutter speed was way too >>>> slow to freeze motion blur. >>> >>> Oh, I forgot to say, this was also shot with a superzoom compact camera >>> during sunset. >>> >>> http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4081/4782164878_56285b02f4_b.jpg >>> >>> You're pretty lousy at knowing how to use any camera, aren't you. Thanks >>> for proving that to the whole world. >>> >> You got lucky. > > Luck has absolutely nothing to do with it. I have about 10,000 more of the > same genre. > > >> I posed my dog for the shot, sitting still, then pressed the shutter >> button. By the time the shutter went off, she'd stood up and had >> started wagging her tail. >> I suppose with your bird shot, it was much the same... > > I suppose you are wrong. The one where it was just lifting from the water > wasn't as interesting as this one with the drops of water trailing it in > the air. > Nice technique - so you stuffed the bird, suspended it by wires, and used clear polyester resin for the "water droplets". >
From: LOL! on 11 Jul 2010 07:53
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:26:49 +1200, Me <user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >On 11/07/2010 5:27 p.m., LOL! wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:14:37 +1200, Me<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 11/07/2010 5:03 p.m., LOL! wrote: >>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:32:06 +1200, Me<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Oh - forgot to say this was taken with a P&S. Shutter speed was way too >>>>> slow to freeze motion blur. >>>> >>>> Oh, I forgot to say, this was also shot with a superzoom compact camera >>>> during sunset. >>>> >>>> http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4081/4782164878_56285b02f4_b.jpg >>>> >>>> You're pretty lousy at knowing how to use any camera, aren't you. Thanks >>>> for proving that to the whole world. >>>> >>> You got lucky. >> >> Luck has absolutely nothing to do with it. I have about 10,000 more of the >> same genre. > > >> >>> I posed my dog for the shot, sitting still, then pressed the shutter >>> button. By the time the shutter went off, she'd stood up and had >>> started wagging her tail. >>> I suppose with your bird shot, it was much the same... >> >> I suppose you are wrong. The one where it was just lifting from the water >> wasn't as interesting as this one with the drops of water trailing it in >> the air. >> >Nice technique - so you stuffed the bird, suspended it by wires, and >used clear polyester resin for the "water droplets". Yes, and emulated the Everglades' swamp-water with resins as well. The sunlight glinting off the resins and backlighting the subject provided by a 50 kilowatt, liquid-nitrogen cooled, CREE LED lighting system focused through a bank of cold-mirrors, filters (to emulate setting-sun temperature), and condenser system so as not to exceed the ~0.5� angular spread of the setting sun for authentic water-droplet glints. The Mangrove bank background was painstakingly duplicated in fiberglass, resin cements, and various forms of cloth to duplicate the leaves and their textures. All dyed in natural colors using ash-dyes for authenticity. You forgot to claim it was also taken with a DSLR, just like all the rest of your fellow useless pretend-photographer trolls around here always claim every time I post one of my NON-DSLR images. Let this be a lesson to you, that *ANY* camera in the hands of a skilled and talented person will surpass anything you will ever be able to accomplish with even the most expensive camera in the world. What a shame that you can't even get a decent photograph with a more-than-capable P&S camera. It speaks tomes about your own inadequacies. If I was that mutt of yours I'd be looking for new owners at the very next campsite, just out of embarrassment of having you as my owner. LOL! |