Monitors slowly evolving
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Superzoom P&S's may have long "effective" focal lengths, but....
Next: What is the point of having 16 bit colour if a computer monitor can only display 8 bit colour? How do you edit 16 bit colour when you can only see 8 bit?
From: LOL! on 11 Jul 2010 07:59 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:15:08 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:2f86bcbe-1145-4e89-a69a-bb6a5d4f9bf7(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml >> > >More colours than the human eye can discern? > >Why pay for that? > What? You don't know? BECAUSE .... if they have the latest and greatest, that which even goes beyond the levels of human perception, this will automatically make them into a PRO! Absolutely no different in how they select their cameras or image editing software. You know, like those audiophiles that insist on having a speaker or headphone system that can duplicate ultra-sonic and sub-sonic frequencies. They will never hear those frequencies, but damned if they won't claim they make a difference to their listening experience. Isn't technology wonderful? It can so easily expose the true fool. LOL!
From: Bruce on 11 Jul 2010 11:09 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:15:08 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:2f86bcbe-1145-4e89-a69a-bb6a5d4f9bf7(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml >> > >More colours than the human eye can discern? > >Why pay for that? The article is typical of the nonsense that regularly appears on the "Ludicrous Landscape" site. Best ignored.
From: Mxsmanic on 11 Jul 2010 13:40 RichA writes: > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml I have to wonder why such a bizarre aspect ratio was implemented for this monitor. Is it just for editing movies in Panavision, or what?
From: Bruce on 11 Jul 2010 14:31 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:40:55 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >RichA writes: >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml >I have to wonder why such a bizarre aspect ratio was implemented for this >monitor. Is it just for editing movies in Panavision, or what? 1920 x 1200 is quite popular in large monitors - 22 inch and larger. Personally, I would prefer a 16:9 aspect ratio as you can see a full 3:2 frame with toolboxes to one side or the other. But 1920 x 1200 is not too bad.
From: Doug McDonald on 11 Jul 2010 15:15
On 7/11/2010 12:40 PM, Mxsmanic wrote: > RichA writes: > >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/10bit.shtml > > I have to wonder why such a bizarre aspect ratio was implemented for this > monitor. Is it just for editing movies in Panavision, or what? Did that idiot simply tru using the monitor on a normal computer, not a Mac? Doug McDonald |