From: krw on
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:00:44 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:

>krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:38:30 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/18/2010 4:42 PM, Joerg wrote:
>>>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:52:00 -0700, Joerg<invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>>> Mostly that will result in a complete redesign. That is when the NRE
>>>>>> that entails must be factored in, to see how fast the effort truly
>>>>>> amortizes. Anything north of four years is generally frowned upon.
>>>>> Yep. I'm doing a redesign now, but at least on this pass the ground rules
>>>>> state that no firmware can be changed. That alone cuts the possibilities some
>>>>> 80% (I've already done the design, including firmware changes). The real
>>>>> bigies would hit the case, though. There is well into six figures in the
>>>>> molds so there is no way that's going to pay.
>>>>>
>>>> That would put enclosure changes off-limits, unless you make a bazillion
>>>> of these per year. I've often run into this "no SW change" or "no
>>>> firmware change" requirement and never really understood it. There are
>>>> nowadays so many trick you can play in firmware that save beaucoup bucks
>>>> because whole chunks of hardware could simply vanish.
>>>>
>>> Depends whether the original firmware guy is still there,
>>> though...often, getting somebody to change somebody else's working
>>> firmware is a complete can of worms.
>>
>> The lead programmer is still around. Actually, they all are with the
>> exception of the guy who went to the FBI. Chasing terrorists was more fun,
>> evidently.
>>
>>> OTOH, since you can still make the previous version, at least there's a
>>> revenue stream paying for all that mucking about.
>>
>> It's an opportunity cost issue. That's above my pay grade. I give them the
>> numbers and they tell me what to work on. Well, I gave them the numbers nine
>> months ago...
>
>Being on my own, and working mainly with startups, I can assure you that
>opportunity cost is a much nicer thing to worry about than cash flow!

I understand. Before we got the TI DSP boat right-side-up there was no cash
flow. The owner isn't wanting to go back there, for some reason. He now has
a choice, save tens of buck per copy or make something new. The only
advantage I see of doing yet another redesign is that he doesn't have to
actually build anything (more) to put that money in his pocket. The
engineering costs are fixed.
From: Mark Zenier on
In article <aml346p9blsmkbe9p1o5bsgsh2l2gbu8ks(a)4ax.com>,
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>There once were connectors that would accept a scope tip. Has anyone seen
>those recently? They were *expensive* but for test jigs they would be useful.

I scored a few of them from the shop inventory on a job I had back in
the early 1980s. The company on the packaging was "Specialty Connector
Corp.". Last I searched for them, it looked like their corporate sucessor
only did pricey microwave stuff.

Mark Zenier mzenier(a)eskimo.com
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)

From: JosephKK on
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:18:33 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>This is cool, a nanograbber for clipping onto fine-pitch parts.
>>
>>ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/MsPacMan.JPG
>>
>>As you squeeze it to open the little wire clamp things, it looks just
>>like the PacMan thing gobbling up dots. Flip the image over, and it
>>looks like some fancy Israeli assault rifle. These cost $14 each, by
>>the dozen.
>>
>>But to be serious for a second: We seed our boards with "test points",
>>really just unmasked vias with 42 mill drills, a nice size to jam a
>>scope probe tip into. What I really need is a thing that I can solder
>>to the end of a wire, like a scope ground clip or a test lead, that
>>will plug into such a hole and stay put and make contact. It would be
>>a little metal tube with a bustle of curved, springy wires, 2 or more,
>>poking out the end...
>>
>> springy wires jam into via
>> tube
>> =========== /------\
>> wire ----- \
>>=====================
>> -----\ /
>> =========== -------
>>
>>
>>Google's no help. Does anybody know if someone makes these things?
>>
>>John
>
>I vaguely remember, from my GenRad days, "pogo" pin ??
>
> ...Jim Thompson

Well known from bed of nails testers. You would kind of need to
convert the scope probe to use one, not pretty.
From: JosephKK on
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:02:00 +0200, Frank Buss <fb(a)frank-buss.de>
wrote:

>Joerg wrote:
>
>> I believe Newark carries them.
>
>Digikey has it, too. Search for "keystone test points" and you'll get a
>nice selection for diameter, color etc. Looks like it is popular, because
>some types are available in container quantities :-)
>
>http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=5002K-ND

By the container? Let's see, about 5000 on a 7 inch tape reel. A
container is about 500,000,000? Sorry, my 'rithmetic is crashing on
me.
From: JosephKK on
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:38:50 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:11:49 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:33:23 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank Buss wrote:
>>>>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe Newark carries them.
>>>>>> Digikey has it, too. Search for "keystone test points" and you'll get a
>>>>>> nice selection for diameter, color etc. Looks like it is popular, because
>>>>>> some types are available in container quantities :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=5002K-ND
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I didn't know they carried these. Unfortunately such test points
>>>>> are comparatively large, for 0.040" holes and similar.
>>>> Come on Joerg. They're only three for ten bucks. You can afford them!
>>>>
>>>> <yikes!> BTW, we use something similar for less than $.10 each. ...and those
>>>> are usually deleted when production settles down.
>>>
>>> I didn't say I can't afford them :-)
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>>> They are just a bit large for modern SMT layouts. Technologically a bit
>>> long in the tooth.
>>
>> We use them on power supplies and a couple of communications lines (RS-422).
>> They're useful for scope grounds.
>>
>> There once were connectors that would accept a scope tip. Has anyone seen
>> those recently? They were *expensive* but for test jigs they would be useful.
>
>
>Not recently. I often use needles, the ones that come with higher end
>shirts. You know, where Murphy says that you'll always forget one when
>trying it on and ... OUCH. Many can be soldered to (not all) and then
>occasionally I use a rubber band to tug a bit on the cable or the needle
>so it won't fly out.
>
>The needles are free, as long as you pay the $49 plus tax for the shirt :-)

That is a mildly pricey shirt. I generally get shirts for $20 each or
less.