NBN Roll out going as well as expected
in [Computers]
|
From: Rod Speed on 20 Jun 2010 05:40 Sunny wrote > Pretzl <petzlx(a)gmail.com> wrote >> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>> I went back to one lousy almost broken connection instead of two >>> So use wireless broadband, fuckwit. >> Wonder if this applies to Sydney suburbs jike mine who have no decent connection? >> http://goo.gl/cUVM > Well, you are going to get more pissed off, Just announced that > Telstra and the KRudd Govt. have reached an agreement that Telstra will be involved in the new roll out of Labor Broad > Band. Thats what his url says.
From: Hunter on 20 Jun 2010 05:41 On 20/06/2010 4:41 PM, terryc wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:19:43 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > >> >> 3 and dodo, fuckwit. >> >> Even Telstra can be cheaper than DSL depending on your usage, fuckwit. > > So we have once again seen that when asked to prove his statements, he > can not and sprays the usual mouth froth invective. > > I get 180Gb for $50/month on DSL. Cheaper wireless plan please. Hahaha really? Care to point us to the plan?
From: Rod Speed on 20 Jun 2010 05:42 Sunny wrote: > " Sunny" <wombathouse(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > news:rpiTn.3681$Ls1.1266(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... > For Petzl (pathological lier) >> Well, you are going to get more pissed off, Just announced that >> Telstra and the KRudd Govt. have reached an agreement that Telstra >> will be involved in the new roll out of Labor Broad Band. > Forgot the reference : He provided his own. > http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=1073357 > "The federal government and Telstra have struck a deal for > the giant telco's participation in the planned National > Broadband Network." > "The $11 billion deal was announced in Canberra on Sunday > by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Telstra CEO David Thodey" > "Telstra will migrate its customers from its existing copper and pay-TV cable networks to the NBN network." > "The deal means a greater proportion of the NBN network will be underground, with less need for overhead cabling than > initially planned." > The last statement won't work in my street, if they need to > jam anything else in the underground conduit, it won't fit. It will if they pull out the copper pair cables.
From: Rod Speed on 20 Jun 2010 05:44 terryc wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> SG1 wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>> terryc wrote >>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>> Those still have access to wireless broadband, fool. >>>>> Now, if I only had access to pots of money to afford it. >>>> It can be cheaper than DSL, fool. >>> Yeah but only if you don't use it...... >> Another pig ignorant lie. 3 is cheaper that DSL even when you do use it. > Right, so "Cheaper" not costs 10x more in your world. Like hell it costs 10x more, you silly little pathological liar.
From: Rod Speed on 20 Jun 2010 05:46
terryc wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Pretzl lied >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>> SG1 wrote >>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> terryc wrote >>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>>> Those still have access to wireless broadband, fool. >>>>>>> Now, if I only had access to pots of money to afford it. >>>>>> It can be cheaper than DSL, fool. >>>>> Yeah but only if you don't use it...... >>>> Another pig ignorant lie. 3 is cheaper that DSL even when you do use it. >>> http://shop.three.com.au >>> Had a look at coverage >> Irrelevant to his pig ignorant lie. >> And there are plenty of others that are cheaper than DSL if you use it too. > why does only you know about them? Anyone with even half a clue knows about them. That might just be why the uptake of wireless broadband is a lot higher than with DSL currently, fuckwit. Then there are fools like you... |