From: SG1 on 21 Jun 2010 18:20 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:889oqrFdj4U1(a)mid.individual.net... > Pretzl wrote >> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote > >>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also > >>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless. > >>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney. > >>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband. > >> So far not had anything to do with wireless > > Those that cant get a viable landline service should. > >> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire >> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?) > > And that is just plain wrong too. > >> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send > > Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now. Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy...... > >
From: SG1 on 21 Jun 2010 20:09 "SG1" <lostitall(a)the.races> wrote in message news:eBRTn.33068$yx.6379(a)newsfe13.iad... > > "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:889oqrFdj4U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> Pretzl wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >> >>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also >> >>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless. >> >>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney. >> >>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband. >> >>> So far not had anything to do with wireless >> >> Those that cant get a viable landline service should. >> >>> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire >>> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?) >> >> And that is just plain wrong too. >> >>> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send >> >> Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now. > > Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy...... Seeing Roddles has his blinkers on still, shall we rename NBN the National Bullshit Network????? > >> >> > >
From: terryc on 21 Jun 2010 20:20 On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:20:09 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > Those that cant get a viable landline service should. So your shares go up?
From: Rod Speed on 21 Jun 2010 23:10 SG1 wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >> Pretzl wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also >>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless. >>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney. >>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband. >>> So far not had anything to do with wireless >> Those that cant get a viable landline service should. >>> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire >>> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?) >> And that is just plain wrong too. >>> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send >> Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now. > Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy...... It can be as cheap as DSL. You just dont get the higher download limits.
From: Rod Speed on 21 Jun 2010 23:19
terryc wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Pretzl wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also >>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless. >>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney. >>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband. >>> So far not had anything to do with wireless >> Those that cant get a viable landline service should. > So your shares go up? Dont have any in any operation that flogs wireless broadband. Its also very viable for those that move around much too. |