From: SG1 on

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:889oqrFdj4U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Pretzl wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also
>
>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless.
>
>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney.
>
>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband.
>
>> So far not had anything to do with wireless
>
> Those that cant get a viable landline service should.
>
>> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire
>> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?)
>
> And that is just plain wrong too.
>
>> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send
>
> Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now.

Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy......

>
>


From: SG1 on

"SG1" <lostitall(a)the.races> wrote in message
news:eBRTn.33068$yx.6379(a)newsfe13.iad...
>
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:889oqrFdj4U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Pretzl wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote
>>
>>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also
>>
>>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless.
>>
>>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney.
>>
>>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband.
>>
>>> So far not had anything to do with wireless
>>
>> Those that cant get a viable landline service should.
>>
>>> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire
>>> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?)
>>
>> And that is just plain wrong too.
>>
>>> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send
>>
>> Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now.
>
> Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy......

Seeing Roddles has his blinkers on still, shall we rename NBN the National
Bullshit Network?????

>
>>
>>
>
>


From: terryc on
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:20:09 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:


> Those that cant get a viable landline service should.

So your shares go up?
From: Rod Speed on
SG1 wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote
>> Pretzl wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also

>>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless.

>>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney.

>>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband.

>>> So far not had anything to do with wireless

>> Those that cant get a viable landline service should.

>>> I are talking about suburbs in Sydney with lousy copper wire
>>> (all underground services, above ground "poles" seem good?)

>> And that is just plain wrong too.

>>> Satellite internet still needs copper wire to send

>> Like hell it does. We've had two way satellite for YEARS now.

> Yes at twice the price of exy, way toooo exy......

It can be as cheap as DSL. You just dont get the higher download limits.


From: Rod Speed on
terryc wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Pretzl wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> Thats what I'm finding with work collegues around Sydney also

>>>> Dont believe they have BOTH lousy landline and lousy wireless.

>>>> You do see a bit of that in very rural areas, but not around sydney.

>>>> And the ones that get that in rural areas can have satellite broadband.

>>> So far not had anything to do with wireless

>> Those that cant get a viable landline service should.

> So your shares go up?

Dont have any in any operation that flogs wireless broadband.

Its also very viable for those that move around much too.