NEWS: Apple looks for an Iphone antenna engineer
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: wholesale Ralph Lauren World Cup Polo,cheap Ralph Lauren 2010 FIFA World Cup polo shirt wholesale,Ralph Lauren Holland World Cup Polo shirt for man
Next: NEWS: Droid X ad hits iPhone 4 with antenna jibe
From: nospam on 30 Jun 2010 17:32 In article <Xns9DA7B11A82CF7noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in news:300620100919538067% > nospam(a)nospam.invalid: > > > that doesn't mean anything. jobs open up for a variety of reasons > > Apple's very lucky to have these fawning lovers they can do anything to who > will defend the company's idiotic decisions to his death, no matter what's > staring him in the face. People like this one would accept anything Jobs > pushed on him even if the goddamned thing wouldn't make a phone call. nobody is defending anything. there is definitely an issue with the current iphone but the exact reasons are *not* known. there are many factors that contribute to it, and quite a few users are reporting that the new iphone works better than any other phone they've had. other users have problems, some of whom can only duplicate it in certain locations, not all.
From: nospam on 30 Jun 2010 18:51 In article <elmop-11B9B2.18281530062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Elmo P. Shagnasty <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote: > So Navas believes everything he reads in the sensationalist papers when > it suits him to spread the sensationalism. > > Facts be damned! Navas is on a MISSION! it certainly looks that way. he clearly has an agenda.
From: Bob on 2 Jul 2010 12:38 On 30/06/2010 22:32, nospam wrote: > In article<Xns9DA7B11A82CF7noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry > <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > >> nospam<nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in news:300620100919538067% >> nospam(a)nospam.invalid: >> >>> that doesn't mean anything. jobs open up for a variety of reasons >> >> Apple's very lucky to have these fawning lovers they can do anything to who >> will defend the company's idiotic decisions to his death, no matter what's >> staring him in the face. People like this one would accept anything Jobs >> pushed on him even if the goddamned thing wouldn't make a phone call. > > nobody is defending anything. > > there is definitely an issue with the current iphone but the exact > reasons are *not* known. there are many factors that contribute to it, > and quite a few users are reporting that the new iphone works better > than any other phone they've had. other users have problems, some of > whom can only duplicate it in certain locations, not all. "Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don�t know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. To fix this, we are adopting AT&T�s recently recommended formula for calculating how many bars to display for a given signal strength. The real signal strength remains the same, but the iPhone�s bars will report it far more accurately, providing users a much better indication of the reception they will get in a given area. We are also making bars 1, 2 and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see. We will issue a free software update within a few weeks that incorporates the corrected formula. Since this mistake has been present since the original iPhone, this software update will also be available for the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 3G." <http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/02appleletter.html> Well I suppose people will make of that what they will, 3G and 3GS as well.
From: John Navas on 2 Jul 2010 13:40 On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:38:06 +0100, in <g6idnRS8As5tiLPRnZ2dnUVZ8qmdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Bob <bob(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >"Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to >calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. >Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it >should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 >bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a >drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are >most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don�t >know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big >drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. > >To fix this, we are adopting AT&T�s recently recommended formula for >calculating how many bars to display for a given signal strength. The >real signal strength remains the same, but the iPhone�s bars will report >it far more accurately, providing users a much better indication of the >reception they will get in a given area. We are also making bars 1, 2 >and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see. > >We will issue a free software update within a few weeks that >incorporates the corrected formula. Since this mistake has been present >since the original iPhone, this software update will also be available >for the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 3G." ><http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/02appleletter.html> > >Well I suppose people will make of that what they will, 3G and 3GS as well. That is too too funny! -- Best regards, John If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive, then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?
From: News on 2 Jul 2010 13:45
John Navas wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:38:06 +0100, in > <g6idnRS8As5tiLPRnZ2dnUVZ8qmdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Bob <bob(a)invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> "Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to >> calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. >> Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it >> should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 >> bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a >> drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are >> most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don�t >> know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big >> drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. >> >> To fix this, we are adopting AT&T�s recently recommended formula for >> calculating how many bars to display for a given signal strength. The >> real signal strength remains the same, but the iPhone�s bars will report >> it far more accurately, providing users a much better indication of the >> reception they will get in a given area. We are also making bars 1, 2 >> and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see. >> >> We will issue a free software update within a few weeks that >> incorporates the corrected formula. Since this mistake has been present >> since the original iPhone, this software update will also be available >> for the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 3G." >> <http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/02appleletter.html> >> >> Well I suppose people will make of that what they will, 3G and 3GS as well. > > That is too too funny! > IOW, fanboi software update pegs the meter at "4"... |