NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
Next: NEWS: Motorola Buys Full-Page Slam Ad Against Apple
From: John Navas on 30 Jul 2010 21:50 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:17 -0500, in <vom6569fqsq01tb7a9sjjtmgr6g4m9k2bo(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >If you and David dislike the occasional cell tower, standard telephone >poles must really drive you nuts. They do. That's why I live in an area where they aren't any. >Not only are there a lot more of >them, (where utilities aren't buried, of course), but they aren't up >as high as cell towers and they're all connected by unsightly wires. >Seems like you'd complain about those long before focusing on cell >towers. Both in parallel. ;) -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern�s Law of Suspended Judgement]
From: John Navas on 30 Jul 2010 21:51 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in <ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>Nope. Try again. > >Actually, he had it exactly right. Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. -- John "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman
From: Larry on 30 Jul 2010 22:07 News <News(a)Group.Name> wrote in news:FrSdnb5awfRH787RnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d(a)speakeasy.net: > > Thanks for your service, Larry. > From all of us in amateur radio, you're quite welcome. Come join us! -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
From: Char Jackson on 30 Jul 2010 23:25 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:51:16 -0700, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in ><ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson ><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: > >>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas >><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >>>Nope. Try again. >> >>Actually, he had it exactly right. > >Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. The number of times I claimed otherwise is 1. And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your assertion. "He who has facts will present them. He who doesn't will deflect."
From: John Higdon on 31 Jul 2010 01:35
In article <Xns9DC5C2F6F85CDnoonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: > It's not really fair because I live in the aftermath of Hurricane Hugo > in 1989, but every ham here has multiple generators. I have a Honda > EU1000i suitcase portable, a Honda EU3000is 3KW mounted on my service > van, also a comm van in emergencies and a Chinese 6.5KW diesel genset to > power my home off used cooking oil which I have thousands of gallons of > in storage. > > All the hams here are similarly powered.... I provide space at some of my transmitter locations for Ham club repeaters. All of the sites have backup power. My own communications room runs on a 48VDC battery plant floating on a Lorain charger. There is a Generac motor/generator set that starts automatically upon utility failure. A number of the groups I am aware of regularly hold drills to test their readiness in the event of widespread power outages. All in all, they are much better prepared than the communications companies. Comcast and AT&T will both go down within hours of a regional outage. AT&T's Uverse batteries will all die, and Comcast doesn't have enough power trucks to cover all of its outside plant at once. Even if they did, the road conditions might not allow the travel. -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last |