NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Security shortcomings in WPA2 that threaten security ofwireless networks
Next: NEWS: Motorola Buys Full-Page Slam Ad Against Apple
From: John Navas on 31 Jul 2010 10:39 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:25:12 -0500, in <tp5756heqbtcf7nus76h321uk8p4phqud0(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:51:16 -0700, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in >><ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas >>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>>>Nope. Try again. >>> >>>Actually, he had it exactly right. >> >>Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. > >The number of times I claimed otherwise is 1. > >And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >assertion. Wrong again. -- John "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman
From: Char Jackson on 31 Jul 2010 11:39 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:39:29 -0700, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:25:12 -0500, in ><tp5756heqbtcf7nus76h321uk8p4phqud0(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson ><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: > >>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:51:16 -0700, John Navas >><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in >>><ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >>><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas >>>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>Nope. Try again. >>>> >>>>Actually, he had it exactly right. >>> >>>Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. >> >>The number of times I claimed otherwise is 1. >> >>And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >>assertion. > >Wrong again. Nonsense. And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your assertion.
From: Char Jackson on 31 Jul 2010 14:07 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:45:08 -0700, jcdill <jcdill.lists(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Char Jackson wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:39:29 -0700, John Navas >> <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>> Wrong again. >> >> Nonsense. >> >> And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >> assertion. > >He won't. He never does. > >You are trying to teach a pig to sing, and it's wasting your time and >simply annoying the pig. I suggest you put Navas in your killfile. > >jc What can I say. I'm impressed by people who have such a strong commitment to ignorance.
From: John Navas on 31 Jul 2010 20:56 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:39:40 -0500, in <2tg856t1eh9orfeb31i06mo0ba8gkd5fsp(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:39:29 -0700, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:25:12 -0500, in >><tp5756heqbtcf7nus76h321uk8p4phqud0(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:51:16 -0700, John Navas >>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in >>>><ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >>>><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas >>>>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Nope. Try again. >>>>> >>>>>Actually, he had it exactly right. >>>> >>>>Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. >>> >>>The number of times I claimed otherwise is 1. >>> >>>And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >>>assertion. >> >>Wrong again. > >Nonsense. > >And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >assertion. Wrong again. -- John "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman
From: Char Jackson on 31 Jul 2010 23:01
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:56:57 -0700, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:39:40 -0500, in ><2tg856t1eh9orfeb31i06mo0ba8gkd5fsp(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson ><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: > >>On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:39:29 -0700, John Navas >><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:25:12 -0500, in >>><tp5756heqbtcf7nus76h321uk8p4phqud0(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >>><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:51:16 -0700, John Navas >>>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:54 -0500, in >>>>><ltm6565cdfeuvvhv3lm9et6g9h71aca2a8(a)4ax.com>, Char Jackson >>>>><none(a)none.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700, John Navas >>>>>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. Try again. >>>>>> >>>>>>Actually, he had it exactly right. >>>>> >>>>>Nope, no matter how many times you try to claim otherwise. >>>> >>>>The number of times I claimed otherwise is 1. >>>> >>>>And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >>>>assertion. >>> >>>Wrong again. >> >>Nonsense. >> >>And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your >>assertion. > >Wrong again. We're in full agreement that you're wrong again. And you still haven't provided any data or facts to back up your assertion. By now, we're well past the point where you've conceded that you don't have anything but your opinion to back you up, so go ahead and take the last word. I'm done with you for now. |