From: nospam on
In article <hf6c9l$vad$4(a)posting2.glorb.com>, WindsorFox
<windsor.fox.usenet(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> And *I* am not worried about it on Windows. That doesn't mean
> everyone is that good.

it doesn't matter how good you are, windows is an easy target, macs and
iphones are not.

here's one example:

<http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml>

First, Houston police have stopped arresting people with outstanding
traffic warrants and shut down the municipal court system for a few
days to try to deal with their computer systems being overrun by the
virus. Then, across the Atlantic, the French Navy is dealing with a
similar problem, forcing them to ground many of their fighter planes.
From: Todd Allcock on

"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:021220091751261967%nospam(a)nospam.invalid...

> on the iphone, everything is code signed & sandboxed. email attachments
> are not executed, you can't download anything from a web page and
> nothing has access to the operating system even if they did.

Only in the Reality Distortion Field would any of those bullet points be
considered "features!" ;)


From: Todd Allcock on

"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hf8t64$7k4$2(a)posting2.glorb.com...
> nospam wrote:
>> In article <hf6cbh$vad$5(a)posting2.glorb.com>, WindsorFox
>> <windsor.fox.usenet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> and how exactly can malware propagate on an iphone via email or a web
>>>> site??
>>> The same way it does on any other connected device.
>>
>> nonsense.
>>
>> the operating system is entirely different, the holes aren't there and
>> on the iphone, everything is code signed & sandboxed. email attachments
>> are not executed, you can't download anything from a web page and
>> nothing has access to the operating system even if they did.
>
>
> Ehh-huh....

nospam is right. A phone, like the iPhone, that is intentionally unable to
download any executable code from the web or email is pretty "safe" as
connected devices go. No one seriously expects a SlingBox, for example, to
get a virus, and it's a "connected device." It's safe because it doesn't
download and execute code from the web. Well, neither does an iPhone,
except in very limited "approved" circumstances!

The sandboxing of apps even makes "stealth" code hard to execute (dressing
up malware as a YouTube video, .jpeg photo, Word doc, etc.) since those
files will only open in their pre-selected applications, will not launch
other applications (like an installer!), and can't be saved to the device's
OS' file structure.

The biggest (non jailbroken) iPhone security threat seems to be, at least to
me, a rogue application, like a game, that has personal data-stealing code
built in that is disguised well enough to sneak by Apple's approval process
and can lift user data an send it back to a server somewhere, but that
possibility seems pretty remote to me, and probably wouldn't last long in
the wild before someone figured it out, allowing Apple to finally test out
the app "retrieval" process and wipe it from all iPhones OTA.

I certainly pick on the iPhone enough for its designed limitations, but in
this case, device security is the advantage reaped by some of those
limitations. (Personally, I don't feel it's worth the tradeoff, but that's
just my opinion. I'm sure others see it as an admirable tradeoff.
Different strokes, etc.)




From: Larry on
"Todd Allcock" <elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote in news:hpRRm.34593
$Sw5.2840(a)newsfe16.iad:

> you can't download anything from a web page

This is true. So, why are iPhones so much "load" on the ATT system? What
is Apple doing that sucks up so much data on a WAP phone?

From: nospam on
In article <Xns9CD6AD62E5B0Cnoonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry
<noone(a)home.com> wrote:

> > you can't download anything from a web page
>
> This is true. So, why are iPhones so much "load" on the ATT system? What
> is Apple doing that sucks up so much data on a WAP phone?

it's not a wap phone, not by a long shot.