From: Alexander Samad on 9 Mar 2010 23:30 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson(a)cox.net> wrote: > On 2010-03-09 16:16, Alexander Samad wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson(a)cox.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2010-03-08 08:40, Frank Bonnet wrote: [snip] >>>> like the following >>>> >>>> eth0 <------OTHER TRAFFIC----> LAN >>>> eth1 <------NFS ONLY --------> FILER NFS server >>>> >>> Since each interface has it's own IP address, the clientaddr mount option >>> might be what you want. >>> >>> $ man 5 nfs >> >> no that takes out all the fun :) completely forgot about that i was >> thinking purely network, still doesn't solve the re packets coming >> back on the other interface potentially > > Both interfaces are on the same switch? yeah if eth0 and eth1 are on the same switch (or ethernet broadcast segment ), you can find that eth0 might arp reply for eth1. http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Using_arp_announce/arp_ignore_to_disable_ARP key bit is the reply on any interface for any local addresses Alex > > -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > "If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given > us arms." Mike Ditka > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject > of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4B96CECC.7070001(a)cox.net > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/836a6dcf1003092025n50027b96jfb03115722eccd28(a)mail.gmail.com |