Prev: pgsql: Clean up package namespace use and use ofSafe in plperl.
Next: ToDo: plpgsql plugin for query and expression verification
From: Michael Meskes on 16 Feb 2010 16:28 > I realized my typo after sending my mail. Sorry if I offended anyone > calling NetBSD FreeBSD. :-) I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might be interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all other archs we have. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(a)jabber.org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan on 17 Feb 2010 04:20 Michael Meskes írta: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28:00PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might be >> interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all >> other archs we have. >> > > Hmm, it seems the patch didn't work. Back to the drawing board. > I hope the amd64 version of NetBSD 5.0.2 behaves similarly, I can only try it as a VM guest... -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan on 17 Feb 2010 06:18 Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: > Michael Meskes írta: > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28:00PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: >> >> >>> I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might be >>> interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all >>> other archs we have. >>> >>> >> Hmm, it seems the patch didn't work. Back to the drawing board. >> >> > > I hope the amd64 version of NetBSD 5.0.2 behaves similarly, > I can only try it as a VM guest... > NetBSD 5.0.2/x86_64 passed all both the main and the ECPG "make check" tests. The BETA might have had a bug or NetBSD/MIPS has some quirks I can't solve. Now what? On a sidenote, this machine fails for the 8.4 STABLE tree, too, in the main "make check"... Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner of that particular machine should upgrade. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= on 24 Feb 2010 12:14 Le 17 févr. 2010 à 12:18, Boszormenyi Zoltan a écrit : > Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already > obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and > two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner > of that particular machine should upgrade. I upgraded pika to NetBSD 5.0.2, and the problem is still there. There are some tests (in "core") which tests for NaN and Infinity, which pass. So either those tests are insufficient, or the code does something different there. Anything you want me to try ? Regards, Rémi Zara -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan on 24 Feb 2010 12:58
R�mi Zara �rta: > Le 17 f�vr. 2010 � 12:18, Boszormenyi Zoltan a �crit : > >> Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already >> obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and >> two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner >> of that particular machine should upgrade. >> > > > I upgraded pika to NetBSD 5.0.2, Thanks very much for that. > and the problem is still there. > :-( > There are some tests (in "core") which tests for NaN and Infinity, which pass. So either those tests are insufficient, or the code does something different there. > Anything you want me to try ? > Here's the attached test code. Compile it with gcc -Wall -o nantest nantest.c -lm and run it. It tests NAN anf INFINITY values with isinf() and isnan(). The expected output is: ================== $ ./nantest computed NAN 1 0 computed INFINITY 0 1 ================== Instead of "computed", NetBSD/x86-64 prints "defined" but the test results are the same as under Linux/x86-64. Best regards, Zolt�n B�sz�rm�nyi -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zolt�n B�sz�rm�nyi Cybertec Sch�nig & Sch�nig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ |