Neutrino oscillation captured in the lab for the first time
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Ohm's Law and Maxwell on Relativity !
Next: For PD....was; Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
From: Inertial on 4 Jun 2010 10:41 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a0088776-1a58-48c3-b16f-f04fb2690342(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 4, 8:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:cbdecb05-16a1-4099-b3cb-49fcbf0a8e70(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> >> > On Jun 4, 3:50 am, "In > >> >> The photon. Gees, how can you even ask such a question? >> >> > -------------------- >> > photon is not dimensions >> >> I didn't say it was. Why should it be? >> >> > crook >> >> Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > if you will not do the dimension analysis >> >> I did. >> >> > **with your own hands **-- >> >> I did >> >> > YOU WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND IT >> >> I do understand it. It is you who does not >> >> > GOT IS MY PHYSICS TEACHER PIG??!! >> >> Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > s o i will help you piggy something that a secondary school could >> > do: >> >> Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > P photon is h/lambda right ?so >> >> Yes >> >> > h is == 6.6 exp34 KG ( Meter )^2/second >> >> Yes .. as I said before, the dimensions at ML^2/T >> >> > Lambda is n1 Meter >> > while n1 is a scalr number >> >> You mean a dimension-less number >> >> > and meter is Meter >> >> Yes .. and so, as I said before, its dimensions are L >> >> > so >> > just go on combine them on one line >> > and see what you get >> >> I already know what you get .. I did all this already for you. >> >> ML^2/T / L = ML/T >> >> And ML/T is the dimensions of momentum. >> >> We know all this already >> >> Why are you wasting my time. I've told you all this before > > piggy crook !!! > YOU ARE PREPARING YOUR PIG CROOK > COWARD DISAPEARANCE !!!??? Truly pathetic, Porat. Nothing but insults again > wHat about the scalars there ???!! They are ALL scalars. If you mean the dimenionless number values .. they are not relevant as we are doing dimenional analysis. > piggy crook Truly pathetic, Porat. Nothing but insults again > ***THE SCALAR THERE ARE THE MAIN BREAKTHROUGH POINT*** No .. they are totally irrelevant to dimensional analysis. Their values depend on units of measure. You do not understand dimensional analysis. Go back to school or study a physics text > THAT AN IMBECILE LIKE YOU DINT GET. Truly pathetic, Porat. Nothing but insults again > SO PIGGY Truly pathetic, Porat. Nothing but insults again > JUST FILL IN THOSE SCALARS THERE No .. they are totally irrelevant to dimensional analysis. Their values depend on units of measure. You do not understand dimensional analysis. Go back to school or study a physics text > the 6.6 exp -34 > the n1 scalr of the L (meter ) etc etc > dont miss anyone of them No .. they are totally irrelevant to dimensional analysis. Their values depend on units of measure. You do not understand dimensional analysis. Go back to school or study a physics text > in oredr that you will say later that i di did it wrong You did do it wrong. . you still are > so > just **YOU ** do a COMPLETE WORK !! I did. > not a partially cheating sloppy crook y work !!! It wasn't. You simply have no idea what dimensional analysis is > AND WE WILL SEE ABOUT IT -- You will never see because you don't wish to see .. if you saw the truth you would know it shows you to be wrong. you prefer to live in ignorance. > WHAT DOES IT MEAN !! What does WHAT mean?
From: Inertial on 4 Jun 2010 10:42 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:648c41cf-cdb8-4e58-9468-bd713840ed20(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 4, 9:51 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 4, 8:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >news:cbdecb05-16a1-4099-b3cb-49fcbf0a8e70(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> >> > > On Jun 4, 3:50 am, "In > >> > >> The photon. Gees, how can you even ask such a question? >> >> > > -------------------- >> > > photon is not dimensions >> >> > I didn't say it was. Why should it be? >> >> > > crook >> >> > Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > > if you will not do the dimension analysis >> >> > I did. >> >> > > **with your own hands **-- >> >> > I did >> >> > > YOU WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND IT >> >> > I do understand it. It is you who does not >> >> > > GOT IS MY PHYSICS TEACHER PIG??!! >> >> > Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > > s o i will help you piggy something that a secondary school could >> > > do: >> >> > Again .. you resort to unfounded and unprovoked insults >> >> > > P photon is h/lambda right ?so >> >> > Yes >> >> > > h is == 6.6 exp34 KG ( Meter )^2/second >> >> > Yes .. as I said before, the dimensions at ML^2/T >> >> > > Lambda is n1 Meter >> > > while n1 is a scalr number >> >> > You mean a dimension-less number >> >> > > and meter is Meter >> >> > Yes .. and so, as I said before, its dimensions are L >> >> > > so >> > > just go on combine them on one line >> > > and see what you get >> >> > I already know what you get .. I did all this already for you. >> >> > ML^2/T / L = ML/T >> >> > And ML/T is the dimensions of momentum. >> >> > We know all this already >> >> > Why are you wasting my time. I've told you all this before >> >> piggy crook !!! >> YOU ARE PREPARING YOUR PIG CROOK >> COWARD DISAPEARANCE !!!??? >> wHat about the scalars there ???!! >> piggy crook >> ***THE SCALAR THERE ARE THE MAIN BREAKTHROUGH POINT*** >> THAT AN IMBECILE LIKE YOU DINT GET. >> >> SO PIGGY >> >> JUST FILL IN THOSE SCALARS THERE >> the 6.6 exp -34 >> the n1 scalr of the L (meter ) etc etc >> dont miss anyone of them >> >> in oredr that you will say later that i di did it wrong >> so >> just **YOU ** do a COMPLETE WORK !! >> not a partially cheating sloppy crook y work !!! >> >> AND WE WILL SEE ABOUT IT -- >> WHAT DOES IT MEAN !! >> >> TIA >> Y.Porat >> ---------------------------- > > so?? > were are you inertial ?? > did you went to consult your > advisers ??? > just add the **all * scalars there !!! > it is very simple !!! I know it is simple. But you don't know what dimensional analysis is.
From: Y.Porat on 7 Jun 2010 03:17
On Jun 6, 7:46 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > On Jun 2, 3:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act > > A transformation from one flavor to another confirms the elusive > > elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new >physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick... > > just like organic chemistry is an entire field because > of the complex structures the :(.C.): atom can create > (all the way up to life) neutrinos will have an entire > field because of the need to understand the nature > of broken cymetry and evolution of the universe. > > neutrinos are not exotic particles. > they are as ordinary and abundant as photons > and they have been quietly changing spacetime > since the beginning. > > r.y ----------------------- very nice but" NOTHING TO DO WITH S[PACE TIME !! it is all **properties of mass**! NO MASS (THE ONLY MASS)- NO REAL PHYSICS !! ATB Y.Porat ---------------------------- |