Ohm's Law and Maxwell on Relativity !
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: Neutrino oscillation captured in the lab for the first time
From: eon on 1 Jun 2010 17:53 you never heard this from a paper or a book !! time dilation must be a capacitor, integrating time you get back later for later use so time is the current length contraction must be a resistor, your length gets back to normal when you stop your space ship not sure what an inductor would be, seems like something is missing in relativity, i need a little help here !!! a black hole must be a Maxwell rigid vortex, because it has a flush which gives vorticity and space must be consisting by infinitely many sucha tiny small black holes close to each other !!!
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 18:03 On Jun 1, 2:53 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > you never heard this from a paper or a book !! > > time dilation must be a capacitor, integrating > time you get back later for later use > > so time is the current > > length contraction must be a resistor, your > length gets back to normal when you stop > your space ship > > not sure what an inductor would be, seems > like something is missing in relativity, i need > a little help here !!! > > a black hole must be a Maxwell rigid vortex, > because it has a flush which gives vorticity > > and space must be consisting by infinitely > many sucha tiny small black holes close to > each other !!! Particle physicists project the idea of space contraction out onto accelerated particles. But it can't be measured and is just an assumption. Space contraction has never been observed. There are no flattened atoms in physics. Flat atoms of a train don't work. The physics for the atom is no longer going to work. Mitch Raemsch
From: eon on 1 Jun 2010 18:13 On Jun 2, 12:03 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 1, 2:53 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > you never heard this from a paper or a book !! > > > time dilation must be a capacitor, integrating > > time you get back later for later use > > > so time is the current > > > length contraction must be a resistor, your > > length gets back to normal when you stop > > your space ship > > > not sure what an inductor would be, seems > > like something is missing in relativity, i need > > a little help here !!! > > > a black hole must be a Maxwell rigid vortex, > > because it has a flush which gives vorticity > > > and space must be consisting by infinitely > > many sucha tiny small black holes close to > > each other !!! > > Particle physicists project the idea of space contraction out onto > accelerated particles. But it can't be measured and is just an > assumption. > > Space contraction has never been observed. There are no flattened > atoms in physics. Flat atoms of a train don't work. The physics for > the atom is no longer going to work. > > Mitch Raemsch yes indeed, not sure what this has to do with what i just said you have a time through a time dilation, which is a capacitor, the time flow will stop when you reach the speed of light !!! which gives you a speed as potential
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 18:19 On Jun 1, 3:13 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > On Jun 2, 12:03 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2:53 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > you never heard this from a paper or a book !! > > > > time dilation must be a capacitor, integrating > > > time you get back later for later use > > > > so time is the current > > > > length contraction must be a resistor, your > > > length gets back to normal when you stop > > > your space ship > > > > not sure what an inductor would be, seems > > > like something is missing in relativity, i need > > > a little help here !!! > > > > a black hole must be a Maxwell rigid vortex, > > > because it has a flush which gives vorticity > > > > and space must be consisting by infinitely > > > many sucha tiny small black holes close to > > > each other !!! > > > Particle physicists project the idea of space contraction out onto > > accelerated particles. But it can't be measured and is just an > > assumption. > > > Space contraction has never been observed. There are no flattened > > atoms in physics. Flat atoms of a train don't work. The physics for > > the atom is no longer going to work. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > yes indeed, not sure what this has to do > with what i just said > > you have a time through a time dilation, > which is a capacitor, > > the time flow will stop when you reach the > speed of light !!! > which gives you a speed as potential- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Eon I challenge flattened atoms physics from space contraction. I believe it is physics that needs to be abandoned. From a point of view of time physics has really just began and the Lorentz transform of space is physics that will be ruled out as a beginning shot. Mitch Raemsch
From: eon on 1 Jun 2010 18:28
you may have a point here listen, when length contraction, space contracts, so the atoms in it will preserve their shape, if any so no stress whatsoever !!! good bye |