From: Y.Porat on
On Jun 2, 10:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/10 11:54 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 6/1/10 12:46 AM, YKhan wrote:
> >> Physicists observe change in neutrinos, unlocking mystery of subatomic
> >> particle - latimes.com
> >> "The new finding is important because in the theories now used to
> >> explain the behavior of fundamental particles, called the Standard
> >> Model, neutrinos have no mass.
>
> > Breakthrough in the matter–antimatter divide
> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> > Particle physics experiment catches neutrino flip
> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> > "Neutrinos, elementary particles with no electric charge that rarely
> > interact with matter, come in three flavours: muon, tau and electron.
> > For at least 15 years, researchers have been collecting evidence that
> > they can change (or oscillate) from one flavour to another. Whereas
> > neutrinos were originally thought to have no mass, such oscillations
> > would imply that they do, a finding that would have significant
> > consequences for cosmology and for the standard model of particle physics".
>
> > "While analyzing data from 2008 and 2009, the Gran Sasso team found that
> > one among billions of muon neutrinos beamed towards the lab from CERN,
> > Europe's particle-physics facility near Geneva, Switzerland, had turned
> > into a tau neutrino by the time it reached the Opera detector".
>
> Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
> A transformation from one ‘flavor’ to another confirms the elusive
> elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick...

--------------------
Good morning parrot Sami
dId you ever heard that

NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!??

(that is going to be the basic new iron rule of physics !!)

and i wonder from whom did you heard it
first ??!!!
can you tell the people who claimed it first ??

and who for instance proved
black on while --that even
the photon has mass!!
- the only mass ??

TIA
Y.Porat
------------------------------



From: Inertial on
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:600954cd-f35f-4229-81b6-b26994e42112(a)e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 2, 10:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/1/10 11:54 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 6/1/10 12:46 AM, YKhan wrote:
>> >> Physicists observe change in neutrinos, unlocking mystery of subatomic
>> >> particle - latimes.com
>> >> "The new finding is important because in the theories now used to
>> >> explain the behavior of fundamental particles, called the Standard
>> >> Model, neutrinos have no mass.
>>
>> > Breakthrough in the matter�antimatter divide
>> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>>
>> > Particle physics experiment catches neutrino flip
>> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>>
>> > "Neutrinos, elementary particles with no electric charge that rarely
>> > interact with matter, come in three flavours: muon, tau and electron.
>> > For at least 15 years, researchers have been collecting evidence that
>> > they can change (or oscillate) from one flavour to another. Whereas
>> > neutrinos were originally thought to have no mass, such oscillations
>> > would imply that they do, a finding that would have significant
>> > consequences for cosmology and for the standard model of particle
>> > physics".
>>
>> > "While analyzing data from 2008 and 2009, the Gran Sasso team found
>> > that
>> > one among billions of muon neutrinos beamed towards the lab from CERN,
>> > Europe's particle-physics facility near Geneva, Switzerland, had turned
>> > into a tau neutrino by the time it reached the Opera detector".
>>
>> Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
>> A transformation from one �flavor� to another confirms the elusive
>> elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new
>> physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick...
>
> --------------------
> Good morning parrot Sami
> dId you ever heard that
>
> NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!??

AFAIK you're the first to make up that slogan.

> (that is going to be the basic new iron rule of physics !!)

Its not a rule .. its not physics .. its just a slogan

> and i wonder from whom did you heard it
> first ??!!!
> can you tell the people who claimed it first ??

You make lots of claims, and put together a lot of nonsense that no-one else
would.

> and who for instance proved
> black on while --that even
> the photon has mass!!

Noone

> - the only mass ??

You mean nothing other than a photon has mass ? .. that can't be right,
seeing all the experimental evidence supports it NOT having a mass.

From: Y.Porat on
On Jun 2, 12:52 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:600954cd-f35f-4229-81b6-b26994e42112(a)e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 10:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/1/10 11:54 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
> >> > On 6/1/10 12:46 AM, YKhan wrote:
> >> >> Physicists observe change in neutrinos, unlocking mystery of subatomic
> >> >> particle - latimes.com
> >> >> "The new finding is important because in the theories now used to
> >> >> explain the behavior of fundamental particles, called the Standard
> >> >> Model, neutrinos have no mass.
>
> >> > Breakthrough in the matter–antimatter divide
> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> >> > Particle physics experiment catches neutrino flip
> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> >> > "Neutrinos, elementary particles with no electric charge that rarely
> >> > interact with matter, come in three flavours: muon, tau and electron..
> >> > For at least 15 years, researchers have been collecting evidence that
> >> > they can change (or oscillate) from one flavour to another. Whereas
> >> > neutrinos were originally thought to have no mass, such oscillations
> >> > would imply that they do, a finding that would have significant
> >> > consequences for cosmology and for the standard model of particle
> >> > physics".
>
> >> > "While analyzing data from 2008 and 2009, the Gran Sasso team found
> >> > that
> >> > one among billions of muon neutrinos beamed towards the lab from CERN,
> >> > Europe's particle-physics facility near Geneva, Switzerland, had turned
> >> > into a tau neutrino by the time it reached the Opera detector".
>
> >> Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
> >> A transformation from one ‘flavor’ to another confirms the elusive
> >> elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new
> >> physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick...
>
> > --------------------
> > Good morning parrot Sami
> > dId you ever heard that
>
> > NO MASS - NO REAL   PHYSICS !!??
>
> AFAIK you're the first to make up that slogan.
>
> > (that is going to be the basic  new iron  rule of physics !!)
>
> Its not a rule .. its not physics .. its just a slogan
>
> > and i wonder from whom did  you  heard it
> > first ??!!!
> > can you tell the people who claimed  it first ??
>
> You make lots of claims, and put together a lot of nonsense that no-one else
> would.
>
> > and who for instance proved
> > black   on while --that even
> > the photon has mass!!
>
> Noone
>
> > - the only mass  ??
>
> You mean nothing other than a photon has mass ? .. that can't be right,
> seeing all the experimental evidence supports it NOT having a mass.

----------------------
one of the features of a good
'craftsman' ' is to see further away
and TO PREDICT !!
IE TO MAKE A REVOLUTIONARY PREDICTION THAT WILL CHANGE future
SCIENCE
(actually is is not out of the blue prediction!!
it stems out from systematic work !!
and real understanding **the basic of physics **
(sometimes from 'swimming' bravely
and persistently along many years against the main stream (as you
can testify about it (:-) !!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------

)
From: Inertial on
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e085805c-4445-4a4a-85a4-085a94c32b93(a)a16g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 2, 12:52 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:600954cd-f35f-4229-81b6-b26994e42112(a)e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 2, 10:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 6/1/10 11:54 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> >> > On 6/1/10 12:46 AM, YKhan wrote:
>> >> >> Physicists observe change in neutrinos, unlocking mystery of
>> >> >> subatomic
>> >> >> particle - latimes.com
>> >> >> "The new finding is important because in the theories now used to
>> >> >> explain the behavior of fundamental particles, called the Standard
>> >> >> Model, neutrinos have no mass.
>>
>> >> > Breakthrough in the matter�antimatter divide
>> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>>
>> >> > Particle physics experiment catches neutrino flip
>> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>>
>> >> > "Neutrinos, elementary particles with no electric charge that rarely
>> >> > interact with matter, come in three flavours: muon, tau and
>> >> > electron.
>> >> > For at least 15 years, researchers have been collecting evidence
>> >> > that
>> >> > they can change (or oscillate) from one flavour to another. Whereas
>> >> > neutrinos were originally thought to have no mass, such oscillations
>> >> > would imply that they do, a finding that would have significant
>> >> > consequences for cosmology and for the standard model of particle
>> >> > physics".
>>
>> >> > "While analyzing data from 2008 and 2009, the Gran Sasso team found
>> >> > that
>> >> > one among billions of muon neutrinos beamed towards the lab from
>> >> > CERN,
>> >> > Europe's particle-physics facility near Geneva, Switzerland, had
>> >> > turned
>> >> > into a tau neutrino by the time it reached the Opera detector".
>>
>> >> Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
>> >> A transformation from one �flavor� to another confirms the elusive
>> >> elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new
>> >> physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick...
>>
>> > --------------------
>> > Good morning parrot Sami
>> > dId you ever heard that
>>
>> > NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!??
>>
>> AFAIK you're the first to make up that slogan.
>>
>> > (that is going to be the basic new iron rule of physics !!)
>>
>> Its not a rule .. its not physics .. its just a slogan
>>
>> > and i wonder from whom did you heard it
>> > first ??!!!
>> > can you tell the people who claimed it first ??
>>
>> You make lots of claims, and put together a lot of nonsense that no-one
>> else
>> would.
>>
>> > and who for instance proved
>> > black on while --that even
>> > the photon has mass!!
>>
>> Noone
>>
>> > - the only mass ??
>>
>> You mean nothing other than a photon has mass ? .. that can't be right,
>> seeing all the experimental evidence supports it NOT having a mass.
>
> ----------------------
> one of the features of a good
> 'craftsman' ' is to see further away
> and TO PREDICT !!
> IE TO MAKE A REVOLUTIONARY PREDICTION THAT WILL CHANGE future
> SCIENCE
> (actually is is not out of the blue prediction!!
> it stems out from systematic work !!
> and real understanding **the basic of physics **
> (sometimes from 'swimming' bravely
> and persistently along many years against the main stream (as you
> can testify about it (:-) !!!

That is correct.

However, you have not done that. You simply fail to grasp the basics of
physics, and in your ignorance spout nonsense that you think is
revolutionary and relevant. You are wrong



From: Edward Green on
On Jun 2, 6:52 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:600954cd-f35f-4229-81b6-b26994e42112(a)e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 10:39 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/1/10 11:54 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
> >> > On 6/1/10 12:46 AM, YKhan wrote:
> >> >> Physicists observe change in neutrinos, unlocking mystery of subatomic
> >> >> particle - latimes.com
> >> >> "The new finding is important because in the theories now used to
> >> >> explain the behavior of fundamental particles, called the Standard
> >> >> Model, neutrinos have no mass.
>
> >> > Breakthrough in the matter antimatter divide
> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> >> > Particle physics experiment catches neutrino flip
> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/42692
>
> >> > "Neutrinos, elementary particles with no electric charge that rarely
> >> > interact with matter, come in three flavours: muon, tau and electron..
> >> > For at least 15 years, researchers have been collecting evidence that
> >> > they can change (or oscillate) from one flavour to another. Whereas
> >> > neutrinos were originally thought to have no mass, such oscillations
> >> > would imply that they do, a finding that would have significant
> >> > consequences for cosmology and for the standard model of particle
> >> > physics".
>
> >> > "While analyzing data from 2008 and 2009, the Gran Sasso team found
> >> > that
> >> > one among billions of muon neutrinos beamed towards the lab from CERN,
> >> > Europe's particle-physics facility near Geneva, Switzerland, had turned
> >> > into a tau neutrino by the time it reached the Opera detector".
>
> >> Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
> >> A transformation from one flavor to another confirms the elusive
> >> elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new
> >> physics.http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick...
>
> > --------------------
> > Good morning parrot Sami
> > dId you ever heard that
>
> > NO MASS - NO REAL   PHYSICS !!??
>
> AFAIK you're the first to make up that slogan.
>
> > (that is going to be the basic  new iron  rule of physics !!)
>
> Its not a rule .. its not physics .. its just a slogan
>
> > and i wonder from whom did  you  heard it
> > first ??!!!
> > can you tell the people who claimed  it first ??
>
> You make lots of claims, and put together a lot of nonsense that no-one else
> would.
>
> > and who for instance proved
> > black   on while --that even
> > the photon has mass!!
>
> Noone
>
> > - the only mass  ??
>
> You mean nothing other than a photon has mass ? .. that can't be right,
> seeing all the experimental evidence supports it NOT having a mass.

The Wikipedia article on mass energy equivalence supports a photon
having a mass -- it's just a rest mass it lacks.