Prev: Proton & electron ever been ISOLATED TOGETHER???
Next: More Mistakes at the Collider !!!
From: Paul Cardinale on 17 Jun 2010 01:08
First, learn what a scientific theory is.
Then study the actual theories of gravity that have been validated.
After that, you'll be less likely to make a fool of yourself in public.
From: Vinyl on 17 Jun 2010 13:49
On Jun 17, 6:28 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 11:24 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 3:26 pm, Vinyl <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 15, 9:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I propose a new theory of gravity. According to conventional theory,
> > > > two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> > > > precisely the same time.
>
> > > > According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> > > > same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> > > > different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> > > > to the size of the Earth.
>
> > > > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
>
> > > so larger objects weight less
>
> > > good bye, try again
>
> > No, larger objects. Just for your info we have a moon. We are the
> > only planet to have a single moon. We are also the only planet to
> > have life.
>
> I'm sorry, the moon is massive!

not true, the moon is empty inside, is artificial,

in order to park the many ufos the aliens must have

they cant just walk the distance !!!
From: GogoJF on 17 Jun 2010 23:12
On Jun 15, 2:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> I propose a new theory of gravity.  According to conventional theory,
> two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> precisely the same time.
>
> According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> to the size of the Earth.
>
> According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
> smaller objects.  As objects become larger and larger, and finally can
> be compared to the size of the Earth, these objects will begin to fall
> more slowly.
>
> Case in point.  The moon is an object approximately one quarter the
> size of the Earth.  Since it is such a large object and still is
> dictated by the Earth, (revolves around it), there finally comes a
> critical point where the object, not only falls slower, but stops
> falling altogether and is suspended in animation.  This is my
> definition of the strength of gravity.
>
> I believe that the conventional theory of gravity is  superficial, and
> only describes motion in terms of our limited point of view.

smallest particle = weightless = fastest = c
larger particle = more weight = slower
larger planet = more weight = slower
smaller particles on planet travel = appear to travel faster = motion
From: GogoJF on 17 Jun 2010 23:26
On Jun 17, 10:12 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I propose a new theory of gravity.  According to conventional theory,
> > two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> > precisely the same time.
>
> > According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> > same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> > different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> > to the size of the Earth.
>
> > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
> > smaller objects.  As objects become larger and larger, and finally can
> > be compared to the size of the Earth, these objects will begin to fall
> > more slowly.
>
> > Case in point.  The moon is an object approximately one quarter the
> > size of the Earth.  Since it is such a large object and still is
> > dictated by the Earth, (revolves around it), there finally comes a
> > critical point where the object, not only falls slower, but stops
> > falling altogether and is suspended in animation.  This is my
> > definition of the strength of gravity.
>
> > I believe that the conventional theory of gravity is  superficial, and
> > only describes motion in terms of our limited point of view.
>
> smallest particle = weightless = fastest = c
> larger particle = more weight = slower
> larger planet = more weight = slower
> smaller particles on planet travel = appear to travel faster = motion

The moon is a quarter of the size of earth. So, it is so large of an
object that it has virtually zero speed as compared to the speed of
light, (of the smaller Earthly objects). That's why Michelson got
null.
From: GogoJF on 21 Jun 2010 20:28
On Jun 16, 11:27 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 12:26 pm, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > sni<

I love ya buddy- the moon does not rotate- it's held and it's fixed
like an object -and there is the dark side- at least there is a side
which is never seen from the viewpoint of here on Earth i.e. it is
merely an object- like any other falling to the Earth.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Proton & electron ever been ISOLATED TOGETHER???
Next: More Mistakes at the Collider !!!