From: GogoJF on
I propose a new theory of gravity. According to conventional theory,
two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
precisely the same time.

According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
to the size of the Earth.

According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
smaller objects. As objects become larger and larger, and finally can
be compared to the size of the Earth, these objects will begin to fall
more slowly.

Case in point. The moon is an object approximately one quarter the
size of the Earth. Since it is such a large object and still is
dictated by the Earth, (revolves around it), there finally comes a
critical point where the object, not only falls slower, but stops
falling altogether and is suspended in animation. This is my
definition of the strength of gravity.

I believe that the conventional theory of gravity is superficial, and
only describes motion in terms of our limited point of view.
From: Vinyl on
On Jun 15, 9:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> I propose a new theory of gravity. According to conventional theory,
> two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> precisely the same time.
>
> According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> to the size of the Earth.
>
> According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than

so larger objects weight less

good bye, try again
From: GogoJF on
On Jun 15, 3:26 pm, Vinyl <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 9:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I propose a new theory of gravity.  According to conventional theory,
> > two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> > precisely the same time.
>
> > According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> > same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> > different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> > to the size of the Earth.
>
> > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
>
> so larger objects weight less
>
> good bye, try again

No, larger objects. Just for your info we have a moon. We are the
only planet to have a single moon. We are also the only planet to
have life.
From: Dono. on
On Jun 15, 12:26 pm, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> sni<

From: GogoJF on
On Jun 16, 11:24 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 3:26 pm, Vinyl <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 9:26 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > I propose a new theory of gravity.  According to conventional theory,
> > > two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at
> > > precisely the same time.
>
> > > According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the
> > > same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two
> > > different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared
> > > to the size of the Earth.
>
> > > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than
>
> > so larger objects weight less
>
> > good bye, try again
>
> No, larger objects.  Just for your info we have a moon.  We are the
> only planet to have a single moon.  We are also the only planet to
> have life.

I'm sorry, the moon is massive! The Earth won the lottery when it
came to the promotion of life.