From: Doc O'Leary on
In article <hvog0h$4j4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote:

> One thing that I _wish_ would work in Usenet is the Bayesian junk mail
> filtering. Imagine having your reader learn what _you_ consider
> not worth reading and keeping it out of your way.

<http://www.smfr.org/mtnw/docs/JunkFilter.html>

Imagine how much faster it would be if I could just *tell* it what to
filter out; at least that's why *I* don't use the junk filter in MT-NW.
Although I would say that one of the major shortcomings of all Usenet
clients I've used is that they discard the offending messages that
prompt me to create filters, when I'd *really* like to be able to cross
reference them and possibly set up more general filters.

--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, localhost, googlegroups.com, astraweb.com,
and probably your server, too.
From: Jason S on
I use Unison and think it's great. Then again, I have only been using
Usenet for a couple months now. (Actually trying out Giganews and
Usenetserver to see which one I like better. Got deals for both
companies).

I'm looking for other newsreaaders and seem to keep landing at Unison.
--
Jason

From: TaliesinSoft on
On 2010-06-28 23:08:15 -0500, Michael Vilain said:

> If you're happy with Unison, keep using it. Most of the other
> Newsreaders have more advanced features that will likely not be
> important to you (e.g. regex filtering on any header).

I'm one who uses Unison and am overall quite happy with it. There are
currently a few glitches that I've communicated with Panic (the
implementors of Unison) about and I expect that they will be addressed
in the next release. I will also say that I'm one that hasn't felt any
need for filtering, finding it easy enough to pass by postings that are
not of interest to me. I'm also one that has no interest (or even
pleasure) in "plonking". My main interest in Usenet is participating in
discussions about things Macintosh where I subscribe to eleven Mac
centric groups. ("Advocacy" is not one of them!) I do apply a few rules
which highlight postings I have made and postings which are
crossposted. For quite a few years Hogwasher was my newsreader of
choice, but I switched to Unison at the same time I upgraded the OS
from Leopard to Snow Leopard, feeling that Hogwasher had become an
abandoned product. At first I missed the threaded message display, but
over time that has pretty much subsided.

--
James Leo Ryan -- Austin, Texas -- <taliesinsoft(a)me.com>

From: Jason S on
On 2010-06-29 10:12:52 -0400, TaliesinSoft said:

> On 2010-06-28 23:08:15 -0500, Michael Vilain said:
>
>> If you're happy with Unison, keep using it. Most of the other
>> Newsreaders have more advanced features that will likely not be
>> important to you (e.g. regex filtering on any header).
>
> I'm one who uses Unison and am overall quite happy with it. There are
> currently a few glitches that I've communicated with Panic (the
> implementors of Unison) about and I expect that they will be addressed
> in the next release. I will also say that I'm one that hasn't felt any
> need for filtering, finding it easy enough to pass by postings that are
> not of interest to me. I'm also one that has no interest (or even
> pleasure) in "plonking". My main interest in Usenet is participating in
> discussions about things Macintosh where I subscribe to eleven Mac
> centric groups. ("Advocacy" is not one of them!) I do apply a few rules
> which highlight postings I have made and postings which are
> crossposted. For quite a few years Hogwasher was my newsreader of
> choice, but I switched to Unison at the same time I upgraded the OS
> from Leopard to Snow Leopard, feeling that Hogwasher had become an
> abandoned product. At first I missed the threaded message display, but
> over time that has pretty much subsided.

Unison is great. I also use NewsTap on my iPhone. Glad to see I'm not
the only one around here that uses Unison.

--
Jason

From: Paul Goodman on
On 2010-06-29 13:39:24 -0400, Jason S said:

> Unison is great. I also use NewsTap on my iPhone. Glad to see I'm not
> the only one around here that uses Unison.

I also use Unison and like it fine. It was a little of an adjustment
when I abandoned Windows and Agent, but for the most part, Unison does
what I need. I don't filter, I just skip by posts I don't want to
read. Based on what has been posted here, filtering is a real weak
spot with this program, but that is something I have never done anyway.
What I really like is the ease which Unison handles binary posts,
although I will admit that I am a very light user of binary newsgroups
and it may not be as good for heavy binary users.

--
Paul Goodman