Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 20 Nov 2009 15:03 The strength of gravity is a push toward the center of mass in space and aether. Mitch Raemsch
From: Inertial on 21 Nov 2009 19:33 "PD" <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler >> explanation. � NoEinstein � >> > > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though he may have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very much.
From: BURT on 21 Nov 2009 19:50 On Nov 21, 4:33 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your > >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of > >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is > >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > >> explanation. NoEinstein > > > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though he may > have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very much..- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Why don't planets fall inward? In there elliptical orbits where is the atraction? Where would it be for a circular orbit? Gravity is a space push that is revealed by falling through the curve. Mitch Raemsch
From: Inertial on 21 Nov 2009 20:18 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1db3dc53-d8bc-4f91-8468-b169b7b3c242(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 21, 4:33 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your >> >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions >> >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of >> >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, >> >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is >> >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler >> >> explanation. � NoEinstein � >> >> > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. >> >> > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be >> > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender >> > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! >> > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" >> >> > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. >> >> > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade >> > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math >> > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've >> > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and >> > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. >> >> I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though he >> may >> have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very >> much.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Why don't planets fall inward? They do .. they continually fall inwards. That's what an orbit is. But they also move 'forward' at such a rate that the fall 'around' the sun and not into it > In there elliptical orbits where is the > atraction? The sun > Where would it be for a circular orbit? The sun > Gravity is a space > push that is revealed by falling through the curve. Word soup
From: BURT on 21 Nov 2009 20:25
On Nov 21, 5:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1db3dc53-d8bc-4f91-8468-b169b7b3c242(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Nov 21, 4:33 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your > >> >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > >> >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of > >> >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > >> >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is > >> >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > >> >> explanation. NoEinstein > > >> > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > >> > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > >> > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > >> > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > >> > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > >> > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > >> > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > >> > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > >> > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > >> > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > >> > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > >> I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though he > >> may > >> have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very > >> much.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Why don't planets fall inward? > > They do .. they continually fall inwards. That's what an orbit is. No they do not continually get closer to the Sun. And they could be all circular curve in the ideal. Mitch Raemsch |