Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 21 Nov 2009 20:35 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eb58dbaa-dc49-4bad-ab69-be7f9f4c0baa(a)u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 21, 5:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1db3dc53-d8bc-4f91-8468-b169b7b3c242(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Nov 21, 4:33 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of >> >> >> your >> >> >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions >> >> >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half >> >> >> of >> >> >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, >> >> >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science >> >> >> is >> >> >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler >> >> >> explanation. � NoEinstein � >> >> >> > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. >> >> >> > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be >> >> > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender >> >> > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am >> >> > wrong! >> >> > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" >> >> >> > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. >> >> >> > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade >> >> > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math >> >> > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything >> >> > you've >> >> > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and >> >> > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. >> >> >> I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though >> >> he >> >> may >> >> have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very >> >> much.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > Why don't planets fall inward? >> >> They do .. they continually fall inwards. That's what an orbit is. > > No they do not continually get closer to the Sun. I didn't say they did get continually closer. > And they could be > all circular curve in the ideal. If they reaaally wanted to.
From: BURT on 21 Nov 2009 20:46 On Nov 21, 5:35 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:eb58dbaa-dc49-4bad-ab69-be7f9f4c0baa(a)u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Nov 21, 5:18 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "BURT" <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >>news:1db3dc53-d8bc-4f91-8468-b169b7b3c242(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Nov 21, 4:33 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> >> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >> >>news:6e6f25be-2612-4bb8-ac26-4fef7811fd05(a)n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > >> >> > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of > >> >> >> your > >> >> >> errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > >> >> >> proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > >> >> >> fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > >> >> >> explanation. NoEinstein > > >> >> > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > >> >> > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > >> >> > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > >> >> > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am > >> >> > wrong! > >> >> > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > >> >> > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > >> >> > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > >> >> > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > >> >> > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything > >> >> > you've > >> >> > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > >> >> > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > >> >> I doubt he's even read a physics book at any grade level. And though > >> >> he > >> >> may > >> >> have been TAUGHT since 1st grade, he appears not to have LEARNT very > >> >> much.- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> - Show quoted text - > > >> > Why don't planets fall inward? > > >> They do .. they continually fall inwards. That's what an orbit is. > > > No they do not continually get closer to the Sun. > > I didn't say they did get continually closer. > > > And they could be > > all circular curve in the ideal. > > If they reaaally wanted to.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There is orbit and there is straight fall. Mitch Raemsch
From: Aleph on 22 Nov 2009 07:53 In article <7e1557d1-d552-4b54-aaa1- a202a01d564f(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:46:13 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> imparted these words of wisdom: > There is orbit and there is straight fall. There is also straight fail. You have achieved that. Do you read anything in the posts you reply to? Doesn't your botcode allow you to do that? -- Aleph This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails to this account will be ignored.
From: BURT on 22 Nov 2009 17:44 On Nov 22, 4:53 am, Aleph <Usenet....(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > In article <7e1557d1-d552-4b54-aaa1- > a202a01d5...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, > 21 Nov 2009 17:46:13 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> imparted > these words of wisdom: > > > There is orbit and there is straight fall. > > There is also straight fail. You have achieved that. > > Do you read anything in the posts you reply to? Doesn't your botcode > allow you to do that? > > -- > Aleph > > This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails > to this account will be ignored. You can go against the curve. You do not have to follow curvature directly. Mitch Raemsch
From: Aleph on 22 Nov 2009 19:43
On Sunday 22 November 2009 22:44, in <f4d53861-789c-46f3-905c-42d914c20478(a)b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, BURT sat down and wrote the following words of wisdom: > On Nov 22, 4:53 am, Aleph <Usenet....(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> In article <7e1557d1-d552-4b54-aaa1- >> a202a01d5...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, >> 21 Nov 2009 17:46:13 -0800 (PST), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> imparted >> these words of wisdom: >> >> > There is orbit and there is straight fall. >> >> There is also straight fail. You have achieved that. >> >> Do you read anything in the posts you reply to? Doesn't your botcode >> allow you to do that? > > You can go against the curve. You do not have to follow curvature > directly. > So that is a "no" then? Ok. -- Aleph This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to this account are very likely to be ignored. |