Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Relativity]
|
From: NoEinstein on 28 Nov 2009 18:04 On Nov 27, 3:42 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Nice try, PD. I'm the one doing the science, here. You are simply the dunce detractor. I've regularly invited you to prove me wrong on any issue. Your only "proof" is that long forgotten seventh grade textbook of yours. Prove me wrong by REASON, not by convention. Since reasoning requires a brain, you've failed thus far. I don't expect you to ever pass a course on TRUE physics. NoEinstein > > On Nov 25, 7:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Nov 20, 2:22 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: You've committed a cardinal sin: > > Improperly paraphrasing my words, > > Then clarify what you mean when you say that what's written in 7th > grade science books is wrong. > > > then making fun of your OWN > > misunderstanding. Such shows how desperate you are in the face of > > overwhelming evidence of your being wrong... again and again and > > again. You can't understand a single thing about physics beyond what > > you so blindly accepted in seventh grade. > > Is what's taught in your 7th grade science book wrong? > > > > > They should erect a statue > > of you standing in the corner wearing a pointed hat, with the title > > DUNCE. NoEinstein > > > > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your > > > > errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > > > > proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of > > > > your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > > > > fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is > > > > an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > > > > explanation. NoEinstein > > > > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > > > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > > > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > > > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > > > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > > > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > > > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > > > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > > > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > > > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > > > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: PD on 28 Nov 2009 20:19 On Nov 28, 5:04 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Nov 27, 3:42 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Nice try, PD. I'm the one doing the science, here. You are simply > the dunce detractor. I've regularly invited you to prove me wrong on > any issue. Your only "proof" is that long forgotten seventh grade > textbook of yours. Prove me wrong by REASON, not by convention. > Since reasoning requires a brain, you've failed thus far. I don't > expect you to ever pass a course on TRUE physics. NoEinstein > Silly, silly, silly game. If you want to claim to win something by remaining stupid, that is your choice. There are lots of people who claim that man never set foot on the moon, that the Earth is only 6000 years old, and that evolution is hogwash. And there is no convincing these people, even with basic facts. They simply refuse to believe the facts. In such cases, there is no reasoning that can convince an idiot to stop being an idiot, as it is plain the idiot is stubbornly holding on to being an idiot. All that I stand to gain here, NoEinstein, is showing to you that you are more willing to renounce even what your 3rd grade teachers taught you than to admit that you've made a mistake. When a grown man makes that choice in open display, as you have, there is nothing more to do than to shake one's head and wonder why. There was somebody else here, who went by Spaceman (you can look him up), who was also willing to claim that what was taught 3rd graders in math class was wrong, but when he realized what he was doing, some small sliver of dignity in him asserted himself and he stopped making a fool of himself and he went back to selling tires. You have not yet found the dignity that Spaceman did. PD
From: PD on 28 Nov 2009 20:48 On Nov 28, 5:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Nov 27, 3:47 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: No amount of side-stepping and errant > paraphrasing by you can counter my true science observations. Though > you write a lot (which I never read more than a sentence or two), my > very clear writing on these subjects is its own best defense and > proof. So, I copy below what I said about Newton: > You really should interact with MPC. He has lots of new posts. He also takes the approach of ignoring everyone else and just repeating what he said, because he's only interested in hearing himself talk.
From: NoEinstein on 2 Dec 2009 21:22 On Nov 28, 8:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 28, 5:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Nov 27, 3:47 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: No amount of side-stepping and errant > > paraphrasing by you can counter my true science observations. Though > > you write a lot (which I never read more than a sentence or two), my > > very clear writing on these subjects is its own best defense and > > proof. So, I copy below what I said about Newton: > > You really should interact with MPC. He has lots of new posts. > He also takes the approach of ignoring everyone else and just > repeating what he said, because he's only interested in hearing > himself talk. What are YOUR motives, PD? Trying to put-down others couldn't be very satisfying. NE
From: PD on 3 Dec 2009 10:41
On Dec 2, 8:22 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Nov 28, 8:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 5:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Nov 27, 3:47 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: No amount of side-stepping and errant > > > paraphrasing by you can counter my true science observations. Though > > > you write a lot (which I never read more than a sentence or two), my > > > very clear writing on these subjects is its own best defense and > > > proof. So, I copy below what I said about Newton: > > > You really should interact with MPC. He has lots of new posts. > > He also takes the approach of ignoring everyone else and just > > repeating what he said, because he's only interested in hearing > > himself talk. > > What are YOUR motives, PD? Trying to put-down others couldn't be very > satisfying. NE I only put down others who are emotionally and mentally incapable of recognizing and acknowledging a mistake, even when it is blindingly obvious, John. Once you stop acting like a ego-puffed child, you will find that people put you down a lot less. PD |