Not using desktop Linux? You're wasting your money
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Mon Jun 14 21:20:02 2010
Next: Article] Lifehacker Pack for Mac: Our List of the Best Free Mac Downloads
From: za kAT on 18 Jun 2010 07:45 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:20:26 +0200, whistleblower wrote: > Since linux is mostly free there's no logical reason why it should not > be debated on A.C.F. Thanks. There you go. It just shows that even an anonymous, innumerate, brown noser, like you Millbank, can fail to find argument with the bleeding obvious. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Craig on 18 Jun 2010 12:35 On 06/18/2010 03:20 AM, whistleblower wrote: > Since linux is mostly free there's no logical reason why it should not > be debated on A.C.F. but there are numerous far better forums to discuss > that op/sys, so A.C.F. is not the right or best place. Look at the tortured logic above. HB really /is/ back. -- -Craig
From: Gordon Darling on 18 Jun 2010 13:02 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:35:30 -0700, Craig wrote: > On 06/18/2010 03:20 AM, whistleblower wrote: >> Since linux is mostly free there's no logical reason why it should not >> be debated on A.C.F. but there are numerous far better forums to >> discuss that op/sys, so A.C.F. is not the right or best place. > > Look at the tortured logic above. You mean "the same old birdshit"? Regards Gordon -- ox·y·mo·ron n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra or ox·y·mo·rons A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in Microsoft Security, Microsoft Help and Microsoft Works.
From: whistleblower on 18 Jun 2010 14:53 Craig wrote; >On 06/18/2010 03:20 AM, whistleblower wrote: >> Since linux is mostly free there's no logical reason why it should not >> be debated on A.C.F. but there are numerous far better forums to >>discuss that op/sys, so A.C.F. is not the right or best place. > >Look at the tortured logic above. HB really /is/ back. I'm sorry to disappoint you but I'm not HB and I see no "tortured logic", only your inability to understand simple judgement. As a member of the Pricelessware Cult that's to be expected. FWIW I have no view on whether you discuss linux on A.C.F. or not, but it is a provable fact that better forums exist. regards your friendly whistleblower :-)
From: Dustin Cook on 18 Jun 2010 16:18
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in news:Xns9D9A3715447E1bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net: > =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in > news:20100616214343.45504c25(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net: > >> Yes, that's right, but I only meant that your thousands of posts >> about GNU/Linux, computer security, and other topics you know nothing >> about are useless. > > So Linux hasn't been around 10 years? I haven't loaded google to confirm, but I think your a bit off with the 10 year mark. I was playing with redhat in the 90s... > So Linux doesn't garner only 1% of the desktop market share after 10 > years of trying to get noticed? I have no statistical information for either side. > So you think in 10 more years Ubuntu will achieve more than 10% of the > market share? Won't happen. I don't know. It depends on the userbase... -- The bear went over the mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other side of the mountain was all that he could see! So he went back over the mountain to see what he could see. Hey! The other side of the mountain was all that he could see! - Green Jelly The Bear Song |