Prev: PLL jitter and tracking filters
Next: A question regarding probe point on high speed digital circuits
From: Sylvia Else on 16 Jun 2010 20:42
On 17/06/2010 2:52 AM, Archimedes' Lever wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:31:32 +1000, Sylvia Else<sylvia(a)not.here.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 14/06/2010 1:42 PM, D Yuniskis wrote:
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>> Ken Ingram wrote:
>>>> Is there any practical way that would enable me to use a single mouse
>>>> click in order to start a sequence at exactly the same time on two
>>>> separate PC's (identical units)?
>>>
>>> What do you consider "exactly" to mean?
>>>
>>> What do you consider that "sequence" to be?
>>>
>>
>> Eminently reasonable questions, which got no answers. Indeed, the OP
>> hasn't posted again.
>>
>> I suspect a troll.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> The degree of precision of the start event WAS discussed,

Not by the OP it wasn't, and since the OP is the only one who knows the
requirement (if one actually exists), the OP's question cannot be
answered in a concrete way without that information.

> liar.

You know, going round calling people liars is a particular low approach
to debate. It's the kind of thing politicians get up to (though in
Australia and the UK, at least, they're not meant to do it in parliament).

>
> The sequence that gets started is of no consequence and is therefore
> NOT a 'reasonable question', it is an unrelated question.

The OP made no statement to the effect that the sequence that gets
stared is of no consequence.

> Your capacity to assess a Usenet post hovers somewhere very close to
> nil.

What has that to do with the question at hand?

Sylvia.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: PLL jitter and tracking filters
Next: A question regarding probe point on high speed digital circuits