Prev: best way to trashcan Nebular-dust-cloud is **neighborhood star ages** Re: (use in 4th) Earth about 10 billion yrs old; Atom Totality theory (use in 4th)
Next: Eric Gisse promotes my web·site ( www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM ).
From: Brad Guth on 1 Apr 2010 00:22 On Mar 18, 5:10 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 13, 10:03 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is there a little something weird about those unusually deep holes in > > our moon that only the LRO SAR can manage to get any depth-worthy look- > > see, as to telling us exactly how deep those suckers are? > > > Otherwise I'd like to know how much of that extremely hot and highly > > electrostatic charged sodium is negatively affecting our spendy LRO > > mission? > > > Where's that detailed surface mineral saturation map of our moon? > > > Where's the detailed surface radiation intensity map of our moon? > > Now we're being informed by our NASA that 40 of those North polar > craters upon of our moon have hidden 600 million cubic meters worth of > raw surface ice that's immune to the laws of physics, as frozen h2o > coexisting at an extreme vacuum of 3e-15 bar none the less, and yet > there's never any hint of h2o vapors, as for suggesting any thin > atmosphere ever escaping or emerging out of any of those craters. > > Perhaps there's considerably greater atmospheric pressure within those > craters. Perhaps theres more terrestrial history to that moon ice and the Greenland trace ammonium of 12,900 BP, than you might think. On Mar 31, 3:46 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Signs of giant comet impacts found in cores > An uptick in ammonium may be evidence of a 50-billion-ton strike at the > end of the ice age. http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/57790/title/Signs_of_giant_comet_impacts_found_in_cores_ How about instead of 5e13 kg, we considering an impactor of 8e22 kg, as a kind of glancing icy sucker-punch from the rear? Our moon/Selene supposedly still offers pockets of original ice, loads of aluminum/bauxite as well as sodium plus any number of lighter and heavier elements. Possibly there's ammonium salt as part of that lunar lithosphere or remaining from its once thick ice covered surface. Ammonium nitrate at 1.725 g/cm3 and a boiling point of 210°C seems rather suited as something failsafe to that lunar environment that seriously lacks O2. Even Ammonium hydroxide seems doable if it were bonded within the cryogenic lunar ice. You know, according to my previous swags or subjective interpretations and subsequent rants on behalf of this weird notion of something very big and icy smacking into us from the rear, and glancing off after conceivably creating our Arctic ocean basin, causing loads of antipodes such as Antarctica, as well as increasing our seasonal tilt as of 12,900 BP, sounds about right. http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/57790/title/Signs_of_giant_comet_impacts_found_in_cores_ "In the April Geology, researchers describe finding chemical similarities in the cores between a layer corresponding to 1908, when a 50,000-metric-ton extraterrestrial object exploded over Tunguska, Siberia, and a deeper stratum dating to 12,900 years ago." ~ BG |