Overall reddish prints
in [Printers]
|
Prev: HP Laserjet 1012: very annoying "Unsupported Personnality" problem!
Next: Help - looking for reset commands for Canon MP390
From: Shooter on 25 Jun 2005 14:09 Sorry can not agree as you get a deflective fire of the head, and this happens after printing. "CWatters" <colin.watters(a)pandoraBOX.be> wrote in message news:%xcve.129844$cy5.7054393(a)phobos.telenet-ops.be... > > "Shooter" <photoman52003-shoot(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:d9ja5c$f21$1(a)nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... > > I believe it can. Kodak Glossy is one when used with a 2100/2200 the > paper > > can not absorb the ink and that is any pigmented so the result is blocked > > head. > > Dirty rollers perhaps but not blocked heads. The heads don't wait around for > the ink to be absorbed on any paper - they are gone while it's still wet. > >
From: CWatters on 25 Jun 2005 15:03 "Shooter" <photoman52003-shoot(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:d9k6kp$i7r$1(a)nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... > Sorry can not agree as you get a deflective fire of the head, and this > happens after printing. You mean the ink bounces of the paper back onto the head? Never heard that before.
From: Shooter on 25 Jun 2005 18:16 No. I didn't explain very well. The paper becomes sticky, this is evident on white boarders with no ink whatever, it then leaves a residue on the head which in turn hardens and causes the blocked head. kodak explained it away by the fact that Epson do not recommend glossy paper with the 2100/2200. My point is again that paper can cause blocked nozzles and this is shown in a nozzle test as deflective firing. OK after changing to dye ink there was no problem with the Kodak paper. Change the paper from Kodak and all is well with pigmented ink except then you get Bronzing with glossy but no blocked nozzles. "CWatters" <colin.watters(a)pandoraBOX.be> wrote in message news:RThve.130093$w33.7138441(a)phobos.telenet-ops.be... > > "Shooter" <photoman52003-shoot(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:d9k6kp$i7r$1(a)nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... > > Sorry can not agree as you get a deflective fire of the head, and this > > happens after printing. > > You mean the ink bounces of the paper back onto the head? Never heard that > before. > >
From: measekite on 25 Jun 2005 20:00 Stevelee wrote: > > > Satoshi wrote: > >> I will go out today to Costco. I will buy and try it. I will let >> you know. >> >> Satoshi >> >> >> "measekite" <inkystinky(a)oem.com> wrote in message >> news:CG%ue.3531$Bx6.861(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... >> >>> Now try Costco/Kirkland Glossy Photo Paper and compare your results >>> against >>> Canon Photo Paper Pro. Use the Canon Photo Paper Pro setting for >>> both papers. >> > > When printing on Kirkland Professional Glossy Photopaper with Canon > Photopaper Pro > setup you are telling the printer driver to use Canon's ICC profile > for Canon's > Photopaper Pro for the print job. This will print fine but it is > really not the > best setup for the Kirkland paper. The vendor (believed to be Ilford) > does not provide > an ICC profile for this paper. Based on my own experiment another way > to print on this > paper is to select plain paper (yes, you read it right), then choose > custom from Print > Quality manual. Set the quality to fine with diffusion for halftoning. > Then in the Color > Adjustment manual make color adjustment if you find it necessary. I > sometimes increase > the intensity from 5 to 10%. The result is simply beautiful. I really > think the kirkland > paper renders better pictures than Canon's Photopaper Pro, especially > in terms of colors. > I am using a 3rd party bulk ink so if you use Canon ink you may > disagree with me. There > is a major difference between Canon and Kirkland paper. Canon's > Photopaper Pro (as well > as its Photopaper plus) is resin coated paper. You can dip the photo > in water and the > ink will not smear. If you dip kirkland paper in water the image will > smear a little. > But other than that Kirkland paper is simply better in my opinion. TO BAD COSTCO DOES NOT SELL A 13X19 SIZE
From: measekite on 25 Jun 2005 20:05
Burt wrote: >Steve Lee - with my Canon i960 and Kirkland paper I have found the glossy >photo paper setting to be better than the Pro setting. > With the IP4000 I find that the Pro setting works better. Of course, I use Canon ink that is designed for the printer. >The two settings for >the more expensive paper gave oversaturated prints in my estimation. > He uses an unknown brand of ink. >Even >for photo paper pro, that setting gave more saturated prints which I didn't >like. > >" Stevelee" <" Stevelee"@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:lr6ve.33300$J12.18935(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com... > > >>Why should people print Costco/Kirkland paper with Canon Paper Pro >>setting? >>Do you have to load Fuji film when shooting with a Japanese camera? >>Canon's >>Photo Pro paper is a resin coated paper. Kirkland paper is not. There is >>no >>point to use a same setup for different paper. >> >> >>measekite wrote: >> >> >> >>>Now try Costco/Kirkland Glossy Photo Paper and compare your results >>>against >>>Canon Photo Paper Pro. Use the Canon Photo Paper Pro setting for both >>>papers. >>> >>> > > > > |