Prev: Panner and Gnome Terminal lag time.
Next: Clamav mail scan with Mutt
From: Angus Hedger on 9 Mar 2010 15:40
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com>wrote:

> thib put forth on 3/8/2010 5:10 PM:
> > Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> I'm constantly Googling trying to find new ones. Apparently (and
> >> unfortunately), thoughtful, thorough, and fair comparative Linux
> >> filesytem
> >> benchmarking is a very rare hobby. :(
> >
> > Best thing to do would be to lurk on Phoronix until they release a new
> > one. You can already search the website for more recent benchmarks,
> > there are plenty.
>
> No wonder Phoronix didn't return results for my Google searches. There are
> no filesystem benchmarks at that site. I didn't even see any HD benchmarks
> there. That site is geared toward desktop Linux enthusiasts. It's like
> extremetech.com for Linux users. Most desktop linux users could really
> care
> less what filesystem they're running, merely going with the installer
> default.
>
> This site isn't going to have the type of information we're looking for.
>
> --
> Stan


Um.. you must have missed something:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=reiser4_benchmarks&num=1
raiser
4 v ext4 v btrfs

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2632_fs&num=1 more
ext4 v btrfs

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_netbook_fs&num=1 ext3
v ext 4 v btrfs

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_benchmarks&num=2 ext3
v ext 4 v xfs v ResierFS (older kernel but ya know)

Regards,

Angus.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Panner and Gnome Terminal lag time.
Next: Clamav mail scan with Mutt