P&S's still have rotten quality (Canon G10)
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: It Pays Not to Own a Camera in Zimbabwe
Next: Wire Bangle-JBA104 Fashion Jewelry,Wholesale Wire Bangle
From: Bob Larter on 12 Nov 2009 23:52 Savageduck wrote: > On 2009-11-12 13:08:43 -0800, Dale Connors > <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:23:55 -0800, Savageduck >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2009-11-11 22:53:57 -0800, Dale Connors >>> <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: >>> >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:12:14 -0800, Savageduck >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The issue is your incessant evangelizing of P&S and insulting many >>>>> here >>>>> who use both P&S and DSLR as circumstances dictate, without bias. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Then I'm sure you'll step up to the plate and correct all your fellow >>>> DSLR-Trolls every time they say something in error about all P&S >>>> cameras, >>>> and incessantly insult all those that use P&S cameras. >>>> >>>> I can hardly wait to see this. >>>> >>>> Not that you would know when any of them is in error. You don't even >>>> know >>>> how to properly use any of the cameras that you claim to have. ....... >>> >>> Well here is a "snap shot' (I am not capable of anything better) of the >>> cameras I claim to have, a K1000, Yashica Electro 35, D70, D300 & G11. >>> Taken this morning with that other P&S you seem to think I don't have, >>> or use, the Fujifilm E-900. >>> >>> http://homepage.mac.com/lco/filechute/DSCF0166w.jpg >>> >>> Now let's see yours. >> >> No copy of this post printed up and included with the pile of cameras? >> How >> do we know you took that photo? You must have stole it off the net. > > I wasn't holding them for ransom. The EXIF is included and you will see > the shot was taken a few minutes before posting. > >> >> What a sad sad shame if that's true. All that gear with nothing but >> beginner's scrapshots to show for it. What a waste of life and lens. >> >> You don't want to see my collection, it would only make you envious and >> jealous. > > Surprise me. I am curious, as are many others. He can't do it, obviously, so I predict that he'll make up same lame excuse. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up. on 13 Nov 2009 00:37 On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:52:52 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Savageduck wrote: >> On 2009-11-12 13:08:43 -0800, Dale Connors >> <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: >> >>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:23:55 -0800, Savageduck >>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2009-11-11 22:53:57 -0800, Dale Connors >>>> <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:12:14 -0800, Savageduck >>>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The issue is your incessant evangelizing of P&S and insulting many >>>>>> here >>>>>> who use both P&S and DSLR as circumstances dictate, without bias. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Then I'm sure you'll step up to the plate and correct all your fellow >>>>> DSLR-Trolls every time they say something in error about all P&S >>>>> cameras, >>>>> and incessantly insult all those that use P&S cameras. >>>>> >>>>> I can hardly wait to see this. >>>>> >>>>> Not that you would know when any of them is in error. You don't even >>>>> know >>>>> how to properly use any of the cameras that you claim to have. ....... >>>> >>>> Well here is a "snap shot' (I am not capable of anything better) of the >>>> cameras I claim to have, a K1000, Yashica Electro 35, D70, D300 & G11. >>>> Taken this morning with that other P&S you seem to think I don't have, >>>> or use, the Fujifilm E-900. >>>> >>>> http://homepage.mac.com/lco/filechute/DSCF0166w.jpg >>>> >>>> Now let's see yours. >>> >>> No copy of this post printed up and included with the pile of cameras? >>> How >>> do we know you took that photo? You must have stole it off the net. >> >> I wasn't holding them for ransom. The EXIF is included and you will see >> the shot was taken a few minutes before posting. >> >>> >>> What a sad sad shame if that's true. All that gear with nothing but >>> beginner's scrapshots to show for it. What a waste of life and lens. >>> >>> You don't want to see my collection, it would only make you envious and >>> jealous. >> >> Surprise me. I am curious, as are many others. > >He can't do it, obviously, so I predict that he'll make up same lame excuse. Bob Larter's legal name: Lionel Lauer Home news-group, an actual group in the "troll-tracker" hierarchy: alt.kook.lionel-lauer (established on, or before, 2004) Registered Description: "the 'owner of several troll domains' needs a group where he'll stay on topic." <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&num=10&as_ugroup=alt.kook.lionel-lauer> "Results 1 - 10 of about 2,170 for group:alt.kook.lionel-lauer."
From: Bob Larter on 13 Nov 2009 09:41 Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up. wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:52:52 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Savageduck wrote: >>> On 2009-11-12 13:08:43 -0800, Dale Connors >>> <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: >>> >>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:23:55 -0800, Savageduck >>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2009-11-11 22:53:57 -0800, Dale Connors >>>>> <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:12:14 -0800, Savageduck >>>>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The issue is your incessant evangelizing of P&S and insulting many >>>>>>> here >>>>>>> who use both P&S and DSLR as circumstances dictate, without bias. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Then I'm sure you'll step up to the plate and correct all your fellow >>>>>> DSLR-Trolls every time they say something in error about all P&S >>>>>> cameras, >>>>>> and incessantly insult all those that use P&S cameras. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can hardly wait to see this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not that you would know when any of them is in error. You don't even >>>>>> know >>>>>> how to properly use any of the cameras that you claim to have. ....... >>>>> Well here is a "snap shot' (I am not capable of anything better) of the >>>>> cameras I claim to have, a K1000, Yashica Electro 35, D70, D300 & G11. >>>>> Taken this morning with that other P&S you seem to think I don't have, >>>>> or use, the Fujifilm E-900. >>>>> >>>>> http://homepage.mac.com/lco/filechute/DSCF0166w.jpg >>>>> >>>>> Now let's see yours. >>>> No copy of this post printed up and included with the pile of cameras? >>>> How >>>> do we know you took that photo? You must have stole it off the net. >>> I wasn't holding them for ransom. The EXIF is included and you will see >>> the shot was taken a few minutes before posting. >>> >>>> What a sad sad shame if that's true. All that gear with nothing but >>>> beginner's scrapshots to show for it. What a waste of life and lens. >>>> >>>> You don't want to see my collection, it would only make you envious and >>>> jealous. >>> Surprise me. I am curious, as are many others. >> He can't do it, obviously, so I predict that he'll make up same lame excuse. > > > Bob Larter's legal name: Lionel Lauer > Home news-group, an actual group in the "troll-tracker" hierarchy: > alt.kook.lionel-lauer (established on, or before, 2004) > Registered Description: "the 'owner of several troll domains' needs a group where he'll stay on topic." > > <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&num=10&as_ugroup=alt.kook.lionel-lauer> > > "Results 1 - 10 of about 2,170 for group:alt.kook.lionel-lauer." *fart* -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on 14 Nov 2009 21:32 Dale Connors <dconnors(a)spamblockedaddress.com> wrote: Hello, "the Liar" ... > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:26:20 -0800, Savageduck >>On 2009-11-12 13:08:43 -0800, Dale Connors >>> You don't want to see my collection, it would only make you envious and >>> jealous. Yeah, we would be jealous of your inability to make photos with any gear and envious of your non-existent cameras. >>Surprise me. I am curious, as are many others. > The only thing I'm curious about is why you think you can ever manipulate > anyone far smarter and more talented than you'll ever be into performing > some unneeded task that only entertains a troll. You would be entertained, but refuse to act, slime? And you think yourself *smart*? Talented you are: in lying, evading, name changing, name calling ... -Wolfgang
From: Robert Sneddon on 23 Nov 2009 08:06
In message <4B0A2F1A.EA869CC6(a)concentric.net>, John Turco <jtur(a)concentric.net> writes >Occasionally, I've daydreamed about converting a C3 into a digicam. Imagine, >a full-frame image sensor in such a precision rangefinder, and the capability >of using all of those sharp, interchangeable Argus lenses! Someone of my acquaintance was an early adopter of the new Olympus Pen camera, in part because he has a collection of older rangefinder camera lenses (Voigtlander etc.) which fit on the Pen body with suitable adapters. He enjoys photographing "retro" scenes (steam trains, 1930s architecture etc.) with these lenses but it usually takes a bit of digital post-processing to make the pictures appear as if they were taken fifty years ago with the original equipment. -- To reply, my gmail address is nojay1 Robert Sneddon |