Prev: How much faster than light are we capable of measuring?
Next: About centre of mass inertial reference frames
From: Y.Porat on 19 May 2010 00:37 On May 19, 3:05 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/18/10 7:26 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > PD (AKA Paul Draper) used to teach science, or physics, in some > > capacity. He considers the status quo to be his Bible of whats > > what. In particular, he acceptswithout questionthe equations and > > definitions in his high school science books, and he expects all > > others to do the same. > > Perhaps you have forgotten that the ideal world pretty much behaves > as the physics textbooks describe. Newtonian mechanics is adequate > for describing the behavior of the world that most experience. > > Furthermore, advance texts teaching relativity and the quantum > mechanics are right on also. > > Does NoEinstein for get that science laws and theories are testable > and that the has never been an observation that has contradicted > a prediction of the QED or relativity. All are very fruitful theories > and help us to understand nature. > > Do some self-education NoEinstein, instead of wasting your time > trying to disparage what you don't understand. ------------------------- one of the disasters that happened to modern science is that untalented people like Sam Wormley are 'teaching' others physics!! byjust quoting others....from existing text books! just a few hundreds of years a go people were teaching others from text books that determined that the sun is orbiting earth and exactly the same the parrots of today teach every body that "NO MASS CAN REACH c !!!!-- AND THEREFORE THERE ARE MASS LESS PARTICLES !!! keep well Y.Porat --------------------------------------
From: NoEinstein on 19 May 2010 14:39 On May 19, 12:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Y.Porat: BRAVO! Thanks for confirming that you are from the Land of the Thinkers, rather than from the Land of the Brain Dead. Stay on the job! NoEinstein > > On May 19, 3:05 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 5/18/10 7:26 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > PD (AKA Paul Draper) used to teach science, or physics, in some > > > capacity. He considers the status quo to be his Bible of whats > > > what. In particular, he acceptswithout questionthe equations and > > > definitions in his high school science books, and he expects all > > > others to do the same. > > > Perhaps you have forgotten that the ideal world pretty much behaves > > as the physics textbooks describe. Newtonian mechanics is adequate > > for describing the behavior of the world that most experience. > > > Furthermore, advance texts teaching relativity and the quantum > > mechanics are right on also. > > > Does NoEinstein for get that science laws and theories are testable > > and that the has never been an observation that has contradicted > > a prediction of the QED or relativity. All are very fruitful theories > > and help us to understand nature. > > > Do some self-education NoEinstein, instead of wasting your time > > trying to disparage what you don't understand. > > ------------------------- > one of the disasters that happened to modern science > is that > untalented people like Sam Wormley > are 'teaching' others physics!! > byjust quoting others....from existing text books! > > just a few hundreds of years a go > people were teaching others from text books > that determined that the sun is orbiting earth > and exactly the same > the parrots of today teach every body that > > "NO MASS CAN REACH c !!!!-- > > AND THEREFORE THERE ARE MASS LESS > PARTICLES !!! > keep well > Y.Porat > --------------------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: BURT on 19 May 2010 15:09 On May 18, 9:37 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 19, 3:05 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/18/10 7:26 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > PD (AKA Paul Draper) used to teach science, or physics, in some > > > capacity. He considers the status quo to be his Bible of whats > > > what. In particular, he acceptswithout questionthe equations and > > > definitions in his high school science books, and he expects all > > > others to do the same. > > > Perhaps you have forgotten that the ideal world pretty much behaves > > as the physics textbooks describe. Newtonian mechanics is adequate > > for describing the behavior of the world that most experience. > > > Furthermore, advance texts teaching relativity and the quantum > > mechanics are right on also. > > > Does NoEinstein for get that science laws and theories are testable > > and that the has never been an observation that has contradicted > > a prediction of the QED or relativity. All are very fruitful theories > > and help us to understand nature. > > > Do some self-education NoEinstein, instead of wasting your time > > trying to disparage what you don't understand. > > ------------------------- > one of the disasters that happened to modern science > is that > untalented people like Sam Wormley > are 'teaching' others physics!! > byjust quoting others....from existing text books! > > just a few hundreds of years a go > people were teaching others from text books > that determined that the sun is orbiting earth > and exactly the same > the parrots of today teach every body that > > "NO MASS CAN REACH c !!!!-- > > AND THEREFORE THERE ARE MASS LESS > PARTICLES !!! > keep well > Y.Porat > --------------------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Massless energy is not infinitely dense. Mitch Raemsch
From: NoEinstein on 20 May 2010 08:58 On May 19, 3:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 18, 9:37 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 19, 3:05 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/18/10 7:26 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > PD (AKA Paul Draper) used to teach science, or physics, in some > > > > capacity. He considers the status quo to be his Bible of whats > > > > what. In particular, he acceptswithout questionthe equations and > > > > definitions in his high school science books, and he expects all > > > > others to do the same. > > > > Perhaps you have forgotten that the ideal world pretty much behaves > > > as the physics textbooks describe. Newtonian mechanics is adequate > > > for describing the behavior of the world that most experience. > > > > Furthermore, advance texts teaching relativity and the quantum > > > mechanics are right on also. > > > > Does NoEinstein for get that science laws and theories are testable > > > and that the has never been an observation that has contradicted > > > a prediction of the QED or relativity. All are very fruitful theories > > > and help us to understand nature. > > > > Do some self-education NoEinstein, instead of wasting your time > > > trying to disparage what you don't understand. > > > ------------------------- > > one of the disasters that happened to modern science > > is that > > untalented people like Sam Wormley > > are 'teaching' others physics!! > > byjust quoting others....from existing text books! > > > just a few hundreds of years a go > > people were teaching others from text books > > that determined that the sun is orbiting earth > > and exactly the same > > the parrots of today teach every body that > > > "NO MASS CAN REACH c !!!!-- > > > AND THEREFORE THERE ARE MASS LESS > > PARTICLES !!! > > keep well > > Y.Porat > > --------------------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Massless energy is not infinitely dense. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Burt, That's brilliant! NE
From: BURT on 21 May 2010 23:04 On May 20, 5:58 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On May 19, 3:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 18, 9:37 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 19, 3:05 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 5/18/10 7:26 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > PD (AKA Paul Draper) used to teach science, or physics, in some > > > > > capacity. He considers the status quo to be his Bible of whats > > > > > what. In particular, he acceptswithout questionthe equations and > > > > > definitions in his high school science books, and he expects all > > > > > others to do the same. > > > > > Perhaps you have forgotten that the ideal world pretty much behaves > > > > as the physics textbooks describe. Newtonian mechanics is adequate > > > > for describing the behavior of the world that most experience. > > > > > Furthermore, advance texts teaching relativity and the quantum > > > > mechanics are right on also. > > > > > Does NoEinstein for get that science laws and theories are testable > > > > and that the has never been an observation that has contradicted > > > > a prediction of the QED or relativity. All are very fruitful theories > > > > and help us to understand nature. > > > > > Do some self-education NoEinstein, instead of wasting your time > > > > trying to disparage what you don't understand. > > > > ------------------------- > > > one of the disasters that happened to modern science > > > is that > > > untalented people like Sam Wormley > > > are 'teaching' others physics!! > > > byjust quoting others....from existing text books! > > > > just a few hundreds of years a go > > > people were teaching others from text books > > > that determined that the sun is orbiting earth > > > and exactly the same > > > the parrots of today teach every body that > > > > "NO MASS CAN REACH c !!!!-- > > > > AND THEREFORE THERE ARE MASS LESS > > > PARTICLES !!! > > > keep well > > > Y.Porat > > > --------------------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Massless energy is not infinitely dense. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Burt, That's brilliant! NE - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Mass is the state of energy whereby it is infinitely dense. Mass is always an infinitely dense infinitely small point of energy. Point particles are mass. Mitch Raemsch
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: How much faster than light are we capable of measuring? Next: About centre of mass inertial reference frames |