Photo of Historical Center
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Hi , Cheap sony and panasonic Hifi
Next: LI-50B
From: Pete on 26 Apr 2010 16:18 On 2010-04-26 19:42:14 +0100, rwalker said: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:02:48 -0500, "mmyvusenet" > <mmyvusenet(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >> Vance and Paul, thank you very much for the very interesting answers, I also >> did another photo I'm showing in the group. >> >> -- >> MMYV >> http://www.mmyv.com >> > > I like this next one in your album: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4551019563/in/photostream/ > > The interplay between the two violinists in the foreground is an > attention grabber. I know that MMYV does not take me seriously so I hope someone else will elucidate my observation: both pairs in the forground serve to highlight the laughter on the face of the girl between them. I doubt I'll ever manage to take such a powerful image. Stunning. -- Pete
From: tony cooper on 26 Apr 2010 18:22 On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:18:39 +0100, Pete <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote: >On 2010-04-26 19:42:14 +0100, rwalker said: > >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:02:48 -0500, "mmyvusenet" >> <mmyvusenet(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Vance and Paul, thank you very much for the very interesting answers, I also >>> did another photo I'm showing in the group. >>> >>> -- >>> MMYV >>> http://www.mmyv.com >>> >> >> I like this next one in your album: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4551019563/in/photostream/ >> >> The interplay between the two violinists in the foreground is an >> attention grabber. > >I know that MMYV does not take me seriously so I hope someone else will >elucidate my observation: both pairs in the forground serve to >highlight the laughter on the face of the girl between them. I doubt >I'll ever manage to take such a powerful image. Stunning. This is a case where cross-posting makes sense. I did comment on this in much the same vein, but in alt.photography. Readers of this group only will not see that, and readers of that group only will not see this. These separate entries in each newsgroup are counter-productive. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Pete on 26 Apr 2010 19:05 On 2010-04-26 23:22:19 +0100, tony cooper said: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:18:39 +0100, Pete > <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2010-04-26 19:42:14 +0100, rwalker said: >> >>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:02:48 -0500, "mmyvusenet" >>> <mmyvusenet(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Vance and Paul, thank you very much for the very interesting answers, I also >>>> did another photo I'm showing in the group. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> MMYV >>>> http://www.mmyv.com >>>> >>> >>> I like this next one in your album: >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4551019563/in/photostream/ >>> >>> The interplay between the two violinists in the foreground is an >>> attention grabber. >> >> I know that MMYV does not take me seriously so I hope someone else will >> elucidate my observation: both pairs in the forground serve to >> highlight the laughter on the face of the girl between them. I doubt >> I'll ever manage to take such a powerful image. Stunning. > > This is a case where cross-posting makes sense. I did comment on this > in much the same vein, but in alt.photography. Readers of this group > only will not see that, and readers of that group only will not see > this. These separate entries in each newsgroup are > counter-productive. Which part of "elucidate my observation" did you not understand Tony? I did not request that you invalidate my observation and sincere praise by switching the discussion to posting style. Once again, you place your personal issues above genuine compassion. -- Pete
From: Tom Hise on 26 Apr 2010 19:31 On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:22:19 -0400, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >This is a case where cross-posting makes sense. I did comment on this >in much the same vein, but in alt.photography. Readers of this group >only will not see that, and readers of that group only will not see >this. These separate entries in each newsgroup are >counter-productive. If people reading this group *wanted* to read posts in alt.photography, they would subscribe to alt.photography. I only subscribe to groups I want to read and don't like some fool trying to get me involved in a group I know nothing about. Cross posting never makes sense - it just annoys people reading both groups. I tend to kill all cross-posted threads. -- Tom Hise
From: tony cooper on 26 Apr 2010 20:22
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:31:00 -0500, Tom Hise <nc0o(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:22:19 -0400, tony cooper ><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >>This is a case where cross-posting makes sense. I did comment on this >>in much the same vein, but in alt.photography. Readers of this group >>only will not see that, and readers of that group only will not see >>this. These separate entries in each newsgroup are >>counter-productive. > >If people reading this group *wanted* to read posts in alt.photography, >they would subscribe to alt.photography. And that's why cross-posting, in this case, makes sense. You don't have to subscribe to alt.photography to follow the replies of the thread. The replies follow the thread regardless of where they are posted. >I only subscribe to groups I >want to read and don't like some fool trying to get me involved in a group >I know nothing about. Reading a cross-post doesn't get you involved in another group. You are only involved in the thread that was posted to the group to which you subscribe. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |