Photo of Historical Center
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Hi , Cheap sony and panasonic Hifi
Next: LI-50B
From: tony cooper on 27 Apr 2010 20:24 On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:09:03 +0100, Pete <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote: >On 2010-04-27 12:17:14 +0100, tony cooper said: > >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:48:39 +0100, Pete >> <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 2010-04-27 09:40:23 +0100, bugbear said: >>> >>>> Pete wrote: >>>>> On 2010-04-26 23:22:19 +0100, tony cooper said: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:18:39 +0100, Pete >>>>>> <available.on.request(a)aserver.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2010-04-26 19:42:14 +0100, rwalker said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:02:48 -0500, "mmyvusenet" >>>>>>>> <mmyvusenet(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vance and Paul, thank you very much for the very interesting answers, I also >>>>>>>>> did another photo I'm showing in the group. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> MMYV >>>>>>>>> http://www.mmyv.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like this next one in your album: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4551019563/in/photostream/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The interplay between the two violinists in the foreground is an >>>>>>>> attention grabber. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know that MMYV does not take me seriously so I hope someone else will >>>>>>> elucidate my observation: both pairs in the forground serve to >>>>>>> highlight the laughter on the face of the girl between them. I doubt >>>>>>> I'll ever manage to take such a powerful image. Stunning. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a case where cross-posting makes sense. I did comment on this >>>>>> in much the same vein, but in alt.photography. Readers of this group >>>>>> only will not see that, and readers of that group only will not see >>>>>> this. These separate entries in each newsgroup are >>>>>> counter-productive. >>>>> >>>>> Which part of "elucidate my observation" did you not understand Tony? I >>>>> did not request that you invalidate my observation and sincere praise >>>>> by switching the discussion to posting style. Once again, you place >>>>> your personal issues above genuine compassion. >>>> >>>> I don't know what word you were groping for, but I suggest "elucidate" >>>> was NOT the word you wanted. Check a dictionary. "elucidate" means "clarify" >>> >>> Yes, clarify. I was hoping that someone would make my observation >>> clearer by using the correct words/terminology for the effect I was >>> trying to describe. This is for two reasons: the OP might take it >>> seriously if it was worded correctly by someone else and I would like >>> to understand how to correctly describe the elements of his photo that >>> have inspired me so much. >>> >>> I would appreciate it greatly if someone assists me with this. >> >> It seems that you wanted someone to "expand on" your statement, not to >> clarify it. Your statement was perfectly lucid as written but you >> seemed to think it did not adequately describe the strong points of >> the photo. > >Thanks for your explanation, Tony. I guessed my statement wasn't lucid >because of the struggle I had putting my sentiments into words. Yes, I >would like someone to expand on my statement. I don't think it needs to be expanded. Your reaction was quite clear as expressed. There's an expression - "don't over-egg the cake" - that means that too much praise can ruin good intention. I think Miguel will be sufficiently pleased with what you did say. Unless your comments need translating into Spanish or Quechua, they will be appreciated. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |