From: Jim on
Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:

> On 2010-07-14 19:53:07 +0100, Andy Hewitt said:
>
> > Yes, it was a deal killer for me. I was evaluating it when I ended up
> > with Aperture 2 last year. I was completely stunned when I realised it
> > didn't have WB adjustment.
>
> It isn't in the same ballpark as Lightroom or Aperture, is it?

I see it more as a Photoshop Elements replacement, but I agree the lack
of WB adjustment is a bit odd.

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Time Capsule failures
Next: Cups or what?