Prev: Time Capsule failures
Next: Cups or what?
From: Jim on 15 Jul 2010 01:41 Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-14 19:53:07 +0100, Andy Hewitt said: > > > Yes, it was a deal killer for me. I was evaluating it when I ended up > > with Aperture 2 last year. I was completely stunned when I realised it > > didn't have WB adjustment. > > It isn't in the same ballpark as Lightroom or Aperture, is it? I see it more as a Photoshop Elements replacement, but I agree the lack of WB adjustment is a bit odd. Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ |