From: Robert Spanjaard on
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:09:00 -0500, Mark L wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:14:34 +0200, Robert Spanjaard
> <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:03:28 -0500, Mark L wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:01:56 +0200, Robert Spanjaard
>>> <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>>>
>>> This was a fun gimmick back in the 70's, done by dropping a long
>>> rectangular "shutter" card with 3 filters in it, dropped in a slot in
>>> front of the lens. (Carnival-ride and moving traffic lights at night
>>> and water-wave shots being the most popular subjects for this
>>> technique.) All three colors of course being recorded on one frame
>>> when done this way. Anything moving in the scene would get their share
>>> of individual color exposures.
>>>
>>> Those of you who might happen to have some burst sequences laying
>>> around might play with this in an editor. Just split each image to its
>>> RGB layers then recombine one of each from individual shots that are
>>> spaced moments apart.
>>
>>In fact, long before turning into a gimmick, it was one of the first
>>techniques used for full color photography.
>
> Yes, but done on 3 separate B&W frames.
>
> Here's a fun freeware tool to make the above-mentioned process a little
> easier.
>
> http://www.mediachance.com/digicam/rgblights.htm
>
> I couldn't find any of their old freebies on MediaChance's new website,
> but luckily this old link from my bookmarks still worked. See this page
> for more of their handy free tools before it disappears.
> http://www.mediachance.com/digicam/index.html

Doing this in GIMP is already easy enough, using the Channel Mixer and
three layers set to Addition.

> Their PhotoBrush, DCE AutoEnhance, and Dynamic Photo HDR programs
> shouldn't be discounted either. Their Dynamic Photo HDR is far better
> than the usually recommend Photomatix.

I don't do a lot of HDR, but until now qtpfsgui (called Luminance
nowadays) does the job quite well too.
http://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/
http://www.arumes.com/photo/main.php?g2_itemId=18
http://www.arumes.com/photo/main.php?g2_itemId=91


--
Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: George Kerby on



On 6/20/10 1:14 PM, in article
2cf88$4c1e5a8a$546ac3cf$5448(a)cache90.multikabel.net, "Robert Spanjaard"
<spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:03:28 -0500, Mark L wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:01:56 +0200, Robert Spanjaard
>> <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>>>
>>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>>
>> This was a fun gimmick back in the 70's, done by dropping a long
>> rectangular "shutter" card with 3 filters in it, dropped in a slot in
>> front of the lens. (Carnival-ride and moving traffic lights at night and
>> water-wave shots being the most popular subjects for this technique.)
>> All three colors of course being recorded on one frame when done this
>> way. Anything moving in the scene would get their share of individual
>> color exposures.
>>
>> Those of you who might happen to have some burst sequences laying around
>> might play with this in an editor. Just split each image to its RGB
>> layers then recombine one of each from individual shots that are spaced
>> moments apart.
>
> In fact, long before turning into a gimmick, it was one of the first
> techniques used for full color photography.
>
>
In this case, it looks like the sensor broke.

From: DanP on
On Jun 20, 6:01 pm, Robert Spanjaard <spamt...(a)arumes.com> wrote:
> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>
> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>
> --
> Regards, Robert                                      http://www.arumes.com

I that the oil spill?


DanP
From: George Kerby on



On 6/21/10 6:45 AM, in article
a619e97b-a223-4fc5-9fc4-3f8efb84004b(a)w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, "DanP"
<dan.petre(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 6:01�pm, Robert Spanjaard <spamt...(a)arumes.com> wrote:
>> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>>
>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Robert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �http://www.arumes.com
>
> I that the oil spill?
>
>
> DanP

Cheap 3D glasses gone astray...

From: Rich on
On Jun 20, 1:01 pm, Robert Spanjaard <spamt...(a)arumes.com> wrote:
> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue.
>
> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg
>
> --
> Regards, Robert                                      http://www.arumes.com

I don't hate it as much as most current HDR stuff.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Where is
Next: Sunday Afternoon