Poles in a Sea of R-G-B
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Where is
Next: Sunday Afternoon
From: Neil Harrington on 28 Jun 2010 10:00 "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message news:e385d$4c250453$546ac3cf$31414(a)cache70.multikabel.net... > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote: > >> "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message >> news:d80b9$4c1e4984$546ac3cf$675(a)cache60.multikabel.net... >>> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. >>> >>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg >> >> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just >> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. >> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo >> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea. > > It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt (with > long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this image > about four monts ago: > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg > > -- > Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have occurred to me. How did you do that?
From: Robert Spanjaard on 28 Jun 2010 11:22 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:00:52 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote: >>> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just >>> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. >>> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo >>> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea. >> >> It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt >> (with long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this >> image about four monts ago: >> >> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg > > Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have > occurred to me. How did you do that? Take three shots, convert them to B&W, and then use one exposure for red, one for green, and one for blue. So the only difference is that you convert them to B&W before filtering. -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Neil Harrington on 29 Jun 2010 00:08
"Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message news:702d1$4c28be23$546ac3cf$18498(a)cache80.multikabel.net... > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:00:52 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote: > >>>> Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just >>>> that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. >>>> Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo >>>> is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea. >>> >>> It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt >>> (with long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this >>> image about four monts ago: >>> >>> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg >> >> Yes, the use of B&W is very interesting -- that would never have >> occurred to me. How did you do that? > > Take three shots, convert them to B&W, and then use one exposure for red, > one for green, and one for blue. So the only difference is that you > convert them to B&W before filtering. > > -- > Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com Ah. Thanks! |