Prev: Where is
Next: Sunday Afternoon
From: Neil Harrington on 25 Jun 2010 15:27 "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message news:d80b9$4c1e4984$546ac3cf$675(a)cache60.multikabel.net... > Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea.
From: Robert Spanjaard on 25 Jun 2010 15:28 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:01:56 +0200, Robert Spanjaard wrote: > Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg Because of the huge amount of positive response, I decided to put two more shots on display. But without the RGB-filter effect this time. ;-) http://www.arumes.com/temp/palen -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Robert Spanjaard on 25 Jun 2010 15:32 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote: > "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message > news:d80b9$4c1e4984$546ac3cf$675(a)cache60.multikabel.net... >> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. >> >> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg > > Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just > that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. > Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo > is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea. It's the second time I applied it to the sea. But the first attempt (with long exposures and B/W images) worked a lot better. I posted this image about four monts ago: http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Robert Spanjaard on 27 Jun 2010 06:43 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote: > "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message > news:d80b9$4c1e4984$546ac3cf$675(a)cache60.multikabel.net... >> Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. >> >> http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg > > Very interesting. Reminds me that I've been meaning to play with just > that sort of thing for a long time but never got around to doing it. > Moving clouds I think are the most common subject for that; your photo > is the first time I've seen it applied to the sea. I've posted similar shots before, like the one below. I think the effect works a lot better with long exposures, and in this case, the usage of B&W source images worked well too. http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_4874-76.jpg -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Robert Spanjaard on 27 Jun 2010 06:45
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:01:56 +0200, Robert Spanjaard wrote: > Three exposures. One for red, one for green, and one for blue. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/CRW_5767-69.jpg Considering the overwhelming success of this shot, I decided to put two more online. But without the RGB-effect this time. ;-) http://www.arumes.com/temp/palen/ -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com |