From: Robert Comer on 15 Apr 2010 14:29 http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itprovirt/thread/d6696012-852d-43c4-a7d4-c2ae626b471e I would like to add that given the fix, it's definitely a bug with a workaround. <g> -- Bob Comer "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:eipblhM3KHA.4540(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Robert Comer wrote: >> Just saw a workaround in the WVPC forum, make your main monitor the >> rightmost monitor in the resolution settings and your seamless app will >> no longer span both monitors. > > OMG! That works! Where'd you find it? > > -- > Now, I just gotta move all my icons from one monitor to the other. > >
From: Steve Rindsberg on 15 Apr 2010 15:38 In article <Ox66hiM3KHA.4336(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, Karl E. Peterson wrote: > Steve Rindsberg wrote: > > Thanks ... > > > > Not sure what I'll use it for, but something will come up, no doubt. > > <g> > > It's the /only/ way to run 16-bit apps in x64, for one thing. Y'mean the only MS-supplied way? I expect a VWare hosted XP/other Windows instance would work ok too. >Also, it > seems FrontPage is totally hosed on w7. For some, a big deal, I guess. For me, a big shrug. > And, one of the cooler uses > I've put it to is this very one - having side by side installs of > different Office versions. :-) <vmware_here>Shrug</vmware_here> ============================== PPT Frequently Asked Questions http://www.pptfaq.com/ PPTools add-ins for PowerPoint http://www.pptools.com/
From: Karl E. Peterson on 15 Apr 2010 17:00 Robert Comer wrote: >> Yeah, the more I thought about it last night, that realization dawned on >> me. That would definitely seem to be the better enhancement request, but >> I'm guessing the odds of that are pretty darned low, huh? > > You never know, if you request it and give a darn good reason most people > need it, they're pretty open to suggestions. Well, I think the way these "seamless" apps (is there a better way to describe them?) are behaving is a pretty good one. Whoda thunk to make sure the primary was on the right??? >> Whazzat? > > RAIL is an RDP way of sharing application windows, it's not just a WVPC > thing. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc239612%28PROT.10%29.aspx Huh. Well that just sounds darned cool! What constitutes a "RAIL server" -- any old RDP host? -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Karl E. Peterson on 15 Apr 2010 17:02 Robert Comer wrote: > http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itprovirt/thread/d6696012-852d-43c4-a7d4-c2ae626b471e > > I would like to add that given the fix, it's definitely a bug with a > workaround. <g> Yeah, it's interesting that MSFT seemed to view it as a bug, too. Worse still, I have this haunting feeling that I've "fixed" something else with that, some time ago, but somehow my monitors got flopped about at another point down the road. <groan> -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Karl E. Peterson on 15 Apr 2010 17:04
Steve Rindsberg wrote: > Karl E. Peterson wrote: >> Steve Rindsberg wrote: >>> Thanks ... >>> >>> Not sure what I'll use it for, but something will come up, no doubt. >>> <g> >> >> It's the /only/ way to run 16-bit apps in x64, for one thing. > > Y'mean the only MS-supplied way? I expect a VWare hosted XP/other Windows > instance would work ok too. Sorry, yeah, I'm sure that'd be fine as well. I just have a thing for "free" when it does the job. :-) >> Also, it >> seems FrontPage is totally hosed on w7. > > For some, a big deal, I guess. For me, a big shrug. I know I'm in a shrinking minority on that one, too. >> And, one of the cooler uses >> I've put it to is this very one - having side by side installs of >> different Office versions. :-) > > <vmware_here>Shrug</vmware_here> Heheheh... Okay, there ya go. :-) -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org |