From: Robert Comer on 15 Apr 2010 17:13 > Well, I think the way these "seamless" apps (is there a better way to > describe them?) are behaving is a pretty good one. For my purposes it works really well!. >Whoda thunk to make sure the primary was on the right??? I never would have, though something's tickling my brain about that, something to do with directdraw maybe? > Huh. Well that just sounds darned cool! What constitutes a "RAIL > server" -- any old RDP host? I don't know if it's any of them, but something like MED-V also uses it, and probably other things. I wonder if the Citrix app sharing is similar... -- Bob Comer "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:Oh$416N3KHA.3728(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Robert Comer wrote: >>> Yeah, the more I thought about it last night, that realization dawned on >>> me. That would definitely seem to be the better enhancement request, >>> but I'm guessing the odds of that are pretty darned low, huh? >> >> You never know, if you request it and give a darn good reason most people >> need it, they're pretty open to suggestions. > > Well, I think the way these "seamless" apps (is there a better way to > describe them?) are behaving is a pretty good one. Whoda thunk to make > sure the primary was on the right??? > >>> Whazzat? >> >> RAIL is an RDP way of sharing application windows, it's not just a WVPC >> thing. >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc239612%28PROT.10%29.aspx > > Huh. Well that just sounds darned cool! What constitutes a "RAIL > server" -- any old RDP host? > > -- > .NET: It's About Trust! > http://vfred.mvps.org > >
From: Karl E. Peterson on 15 Apr 2010 17:55 Robert Comer wrote: >> Well, I think the way these "seamless" apps (is there a better way to >> describe them?) are behaving is a pretty good one. > > For my purposes it works really well!. Yeah, me too. Now. <g> >>Whoda thunk to make sure the primary was on the right??? > > I never would have, though something's tickling my brain about that, > something to do with directdraw maybe? Looking at my system coords now that I've moved the primary to the right, I see: 0: "Virtual", (-1600,0)-(1600,1200), Desktop: False, VGA: False, Visible: True 1: "\\.\DISPLAY1", (0,0)-(1600,1200), Workarea: (0,0)-(1600,1160), Desktop: True, VGA: False, Visible: True, Primary 2: "\\.\DISPLAY2", (-1600,0)-(0,1200), Desktop: True, VGA: False, Visible: True I'm thinking it may have to do with positive coordinate space? The monitor on the left now ranges from -1600 to 0 on the X axis! So is the driver just too stupid to consider that visible space? >> Huh. Well that just sounds darned cool! What constitutes a "RAIL server" >> -- any old RDP host? > > I don't know if it's any of them, but something like MED-V also uses it, and > probably other things. I wonder if the Citrix app sharing is similar... Heh, well, I have no idea about MED-V either. But if I could run a remote app as though it were local, from any machine I connect to via RDP, I'd be a very happy camper. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Robert Comer on 15 Apr 2010 18:40 > I'm thinking it may have to do with positive coordinate space? The > monitor on the left now ranges from -1600 to 0 on the X axis! So is the > driver just too stupid to consider that visible space? I don't know, it's beyond my knowledge. Seems awfully odd though. > Heh, well, I have no idea about MED-V either. But if I could run a remote > app as though it were local, from any machine I connect to via RDP, I'd be > a very happy camper. I think there's some kind of toolkit for RAIL, I'll see if I can find where I saw it. -- Bob Comer "Karl E. Peterson" <karl(a)exmvps.org> wrote in message news:#ad8lZO3KHA.3580(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Robert Comer wrote: >>> Well, I think the way these "seamless" apps (is there a better way to >>> describe them?) are behaving is a pretty good one. >> >> For my purposes it works really well!. > > Yeah, me too. Now. <g> > >>>Whoda thunk to make sure the primary was on the right??? >> >> I never would have, though something's tickling my brain about that, >> something to do with directdraw maybe? > > Looking at my system coords now that I've moved the primary to the right, > I see: > > 0: "Virtual", (-1600,0)-(1600,1200), Desktop: False, VGA: False, Visible: > True > > 1: "\\.\DISPLAY1", (0,0)-(1600,1200), Workarea: (0,0)-(1600,1160), > Desktop: True, VGA: False, Visible: True, Primary > > 2: "\\.\DISPLAY2", (-1600,0)-(0,1200), Desktop: True, VGA: False, Visible: > True > > I'm thinking it may have to do with positive coordinate space? The > monitor on the left now ranges from -1600 to 0 on the X axis! So is the > driver just too stupid to consider that visible space? > >>> Huh. Well that just sounds darned cool! What constitutes a "RAIL >>> server" -- any old RDP host? >> >> I don't know if it's any of them, but something like MED-V also uses it, >> and probably other things. I wonder if the Citrix app sharing is >> similar... > > Heh, well, I have no idea about MED-V either. But if I could run a remote > app as though it were local, from any machine I connect to via RDP, I'd be > a very happy camper. > > -- > .NET: It's About Trust! > http://vfred.mvps.org > >
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: Mouse issues with Virtual PC Next: Start VirtualPC minimized on Windows 7 |