Prev: Some great free downloads. Including FileZilla
Next: Semitransparent on-screen ruler
From: Samuel Luter on 21 Dec 2009 14:31
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:59:03 +0000 (UTC), Jack D. Russell, Sr. wrote:

> Jack

whothefuckRU?
From: Samuel Luter on 21 Dec 2009 17:19
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:55:45 -0600, REM wrote:

>> hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> YOU host the ISOs but are unable to provide material evidence
>> that each program on the ISOs is fully authorised by its author.
>> That means you are unlawfully hosting CD.ISOs on your server.
>
> Proof positive that if you repeat a lie long enough... well, it's
> still a lie. I only accept donations over $19.95

ok
From: »Q« on 21 Dec 2009 22:28
In <news:c2578e142deff53a177602ff9f0a87ce(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:

> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>
> >In <news:41b77eefcf08293f3518f51cc8d8a874(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
> >hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
> >
> >> '»Q«' wrote thus:
> >> > <http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/>
> >
> >> "Each year, the alt.comp.freeware newsgroup puts together a list
> >> of "the best of the best in Freeware", the Pricelessware List."
> >
> >The ISOs don't all the freeware that a.c.f put on the lists, just the
> >stuff whose authors gave permission to redistribute. In case you're
> >interested in more information, see
> ><http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/2008/2008PL-CD-about.php>
>
> Irrelevant, but a good try at diversion...

I'm a bit surprised you find it irrelevant that the ISOs have only
freeware whose authors gave permission.

I'd never try to use the ISOs to divert you from your hate-on for
Pricelessware in general. What do you hate worse, the List or the
ISOs? Just curious.
From: »Q« on 21 Dec 2009 22:29
People without paranoid fantasies about gangs of fictitious criminals
can get the PL ISOs from <http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl>, among
other places.

Read on only if you enjoy hummingbird's kookery.

In <news:7a70eb08f385de45ae5bc7eb48fa8817(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:

> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>
> >Since the Subject is PL CD downloads,
>
> Em. Only because you changed it last time.

No, not last time. Try to keep up.

> I've changed it back.

You've reached a new level of idiocy, changing the Subject of a thread
about PL CD downloads back to something about a Firefox beta, which is
no longer even being mentioned in this branch of the thread.

> This one's much better: http://preview.xrl.in/42sc

That one leads to an 'aracari' domain that you've claimed has some kind
of unlawful content. Also, that domain cannot be reached -- perhaps
Scotland Yard has come by and shut it down based on your
allegations about it? ;)

> >> >You *still* haven't figured out how to killfile me?
> >>
> >> Wrong.
> >
> >Congrats on figuring it out after all these years.
>
> Wrong. I always knew how it works

How strange that you've always been completely unable to do, despite
your claims that you have done it. Here's a test: if you're reading
this now, you've failed again, hummingbird.

> >Are you planning to actually do it or will you spend several more
> >years reading all my posts?
>
> Dear oh dear.

I don't really mind you reading all my posts, but I do wish you
wouldn't call me that.

> >> I have explained to you ad nauseam how Hamster works.
> >
> >You're well aware that I understand Hamster better than you do.

> Your many comments over many months make it quite clear you
> do not know how Hamster works ...nor how I use it.

What's clear to you isn't clear to people who actually know how to
use Hamster. You claim to have killfiled me yet you read all my
posts; good luck holding yourself up as some kind of Hamster expert.

Maybe it would help if you resumed adding "get by mid" to your
replies, to highlight the fact that you go out of your way to read all
the posts you claim to have killed.

> But it is a bit complicated, so one has to show sympathy :-)

It's not terribly complicated; the filtering you can't manage is
particularly simple.

By the way, people without paranoid fantasies about gangs of fictitious
criminals can get the PL ISOs from <http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl>,
among other places.
From: Nicolaas Hawkins on 22 Dec 2009 01:17
»Q« <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote:

> In <news:c2578e142deff53a177602ff9f0a87ce(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
> hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>>
>>>In <news:41b77eefcf08293f3518f51cc8d8a874(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
>>>hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>
>>>> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>>>> > <http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/>
>>>
>>>> "Each year, the alt.comp.freeware newsgroup puts together a list
>>>> of "the best of the best in Freeware", the Pricelessware List."
>>>
>>>The ISOs don't all the freeware that a.c.f put on the lists, just the
>>>stuff whose authors gave permission to redistribute. In case you're
>>>interested in more information, see
>>><http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/2008/2008PL-CD-about.php>
>>
>> Irrelevant, but a good try at diversion...
>
> I'm a bit surprised you find it irrelevant that the ISOs have only
> freeware whose authors gave permission.
>
> I'd never try to use the ISOs to divert you from your hate-on for
> Pricelessware in general. What do you hate worse, the List or the
> ISOs? Just curious.

It's looking increasingly unlikely that there will be an official release of
either for the current season.

--
- Nicolaas
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Some great free downloads. Including FileZilla
Next: Semitransparent on-screen ruler