Prev: Some great free downloads. Including FileZilla
Next: Semitransparent on-screen ruler
From: Craig on 22 Dec 2009 02:05
On 12/21/2009 10:17 PM, Nicolaas Hawkins wrote:
> »Q«<boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> In<news:c2578e142deff53a177602ff9f0a87ce(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
>> hummingbird<hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>
>>> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>> In<news:41b77eefcf08293f3518f51cc8d8a874(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
>>>> hummingbird<hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> '»Q«' wrote thus:
>>>>>> <http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/>
>>>>
>>>>> "Each year, the alt.comp.freeware newsgroup puts together a list
>>>>> of "the best of the best in Freeware", the Pricelessware List."
>>>>
>>>> The ISOs don't all the freeware that a.c.f put on the lists, just the
>>>> stuff whose authors gave permission to redistribute. In case you're
>>>> interested in more information, see
>>>> <http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/2008/2008PL-CD-about.php>
>>>
>>> Irrelevant, but a good try at diversion...
>>
>> I'm a bit surprised you find it irrelevant that the ISOs have only
>> freeware whose authors gave permission.
>>
>> I'd never try to use the ISOs to divert you from your hate-on for
>> Pricelessware in general. What do you hate worse, the List or the
>> ISOs? Just curious.
>
> It's looking increasingly unlikely that there will be an official release of
> either for the current season.

With each passing day.

By the way, what's your interest? Wanna help?

--
-Craig
From: Nicolaas Hawkins on 22 Dec 2009 03:16
Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/21/2009 10:17 PM, Nicolaas Hawkins wrote:

>> »Q«<boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote:

>>> I'd never try to use the ISOs to divert you from your hate-on for
>>> Pricelessware in general. What do you hate worse, the List or the
>>> ISOs? Just curious.

>> It's looking increasingly unlikely that there will be an official release of
>> either for the current season.

> With each passing day.
>
> By the way, what's your interest?

Do I need to have 'an intetest' in order to make an observation?


>Wanna help?

The answer is the same as it was last time you asked, and has been for the
last five years.

--
- Nicolaas
From: Craig on 22 Dec 2009 11:52
On 12/22/2009 12:16 AM, Nicolaas Hawkins wrote:
> Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/21/2009 10:17 PM, Nicolaas Hawkins wrote:
>
>>> »Q«<boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>>> I'd never try to use the ISOs to divert you from your hate-on for
>>>> Pricelessware in general. What do you hate worse, the List or the
>>>> ISOs? Just curious.
>
>>> It's looking increasingly unlikely that there will be an official release of
>>> either for the current season.
>
>> With each passing day.
>>
>> By the way, what's your interest?
>
> Do I need to have 'an intetest' in order to make an observation?

One doesn't need much of anything to post anything here.

>
>> Wanna help?
>
> The answer is the same as it was last time you asked, and has been for the
> last five years.

Then there's still a chance!

best,
--
-Craig
From: Franklin on 22 Dec 2009 12:23
Craig wrote:

> On 12/21/2009 08:55 AM, hummingbird wrote:
>> the material has been provided
>
> Correct. It's a matter of record:
>
> Message-ID: <97fwmjs6treg$.dlg(a)br.ederson.news.arcor.de>
>

In addition to that, BeAr Ederson also wrote this about freeware
permissions:

Google:
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/a3180b501500506d>

Message-ID:
<news:1jtv749i9gixq$.dlg(a)br.ederson.news.arcor.de>

Of course, the entire debate about freeware permissions is just a troll set
up a few months ago as a diversary tactic by Hummingbird and "David W"
(also posting as "Bear Bottoms"). It uses a false premise and no one
really believes it. Not even Hummingbird.

--
"Bear Bottoms" and "David W" used to post in synchronization:
<http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock>
<http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2>
From: Samuel Luter on 22 Dec 2009 17:04
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:13 -0600, REM wrote:

>> hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>>la la la. Have you not posted in the name of jimmy scott and REM
>>in the same thread? :-)
>
> At work and at home... two PCs setup slightly differently in Agent
> settings? Yes, I did until I saw the error.
>
> That is not a sock puppet. That was an error in setting up a new
> program.

ru jimmy?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Some great free downloads. Including FileZilla
Next: Semitransparent on-screen ruler