From: Peggy on
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:13:52 -0500, Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:45:25 -0500, Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:57:02 +1000, Peggy <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:51:16 -0500, Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >Use this thread to discuss whatever you think is relevant to the
>> > >subject line. I will monitor this and other PL2009 threads through
>> > >Google Groups so I don't miss any posts.
>> >
>> > I would like to nominate Forte Free Agent version 1.93,
>> > however I can't find a download link for this version.
>> >
>> > I have not used the Free version - version 3. So I dont think that I
>> > should nominate something I haven't used!
>>
>> I found one, but I can't vouch for whether it's legit or not:
>>
>> http://www.downloadpipe.com/Windows/network-internet/review-Free-Agent-1225941.html
>
>Forget that link. The MD5 checksum is bad.
>
> a487ff5f5682ac6e4345048d3cfd2eb8
>
>I checked it against my personal archive that I got from Forte in 2002
>for a32en193.exe. That MD5 is:
>
> bc39a90a1eed06b318bffb52e738df7d
>
>I found another link here with the *good* checksum:
>
>http://www.cc.uom.gr/pub/FREEWARE/INTERNET%20TOOLS/Newsreaders-Usenet/a32en193.exe
>
>I don't know the pedigree of that site either, but the MD5 matches.
>
>???

Thank you for your help with this Ron


--
Peggy Gee
From: Ron May on
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:07:47 +1000, Peggy <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:

>
> Thank you for your help with this Ron

You're welcome, but I think the link s|b provided was even better:

http://mirrors.easynews.com/agent/ftp.forteinc.com/

You have to drill down some to get to it, but here:

http://mirrors.easynews.com/agent/ftp.forteinc.com/pub/agent/english/

you'll find the second file, a32en193.exe, is what you're looking for.
There are later versions as well. I believe 3.3 was the last that
defaulted to a free application after the trial period. Starting with
4.0, Agent stops working after the trial period. IIRC, you can still
access what you downloaded, but you can't go online until/unless you
upgrade to the $ware version.

--
Ron M.
Help improve the ACF experience. Please don't feed the trolls.
New to the group? Check out http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/
and try to ignore the threads that aren't freeware related.
From: Ron May on
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:11:54 +0200, Yrrah
<Yrrah-acf2009(a)newprovider.invalid> wrote:

> Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>:
>
> > I will monitor this and other PL2009 threads through
> > Google Groups so I don't miss any posts.
>
> A guarantee to miss posts afaik.
>
> Yrrah

The problem is in wearing two hats, Yrrah. Reading this NG as an
individual, I do it from behind filters. Acting as a volunteer "point
person" is a little different. That hat requires reading all opinions
in the "official" threads. I still primarily download and read the
bulk of the messages in the normal way, but I also check google groups
online in the [PL] threads only. Example:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/browse_frm/thread/55e0b7cd68ff9255?hl=en#

I hit the "sort by date" in the left pane. I keep track of the last
message I read via GG, and any new posts appear at the bottom. If
need be, I can look at "Show original" and port any message I want to
keep into my regular newsreader by usingf the Message-ID.

To paraphrase a line from the movie "Speed", that seats me in the fair
but not stupid section. <g>



--
Ron M.
Help improve the ACF experience. Please don't feed the trolls.
New to the group? Check out http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/
and try to ignore the threads that aren't freeware related.
From: Jim S on
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:04:35 +0200, Yrrah wrote:

> Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>:
>
>> Use this thread to discuss whatever you think is relevant to the
>> subject line. I will monitor this and other PL2009 threads through
>> Google Groups so I don't miss any posts.
>
> I think the whole thing should be called off. There are too many
> nominations from people we have not seen here before / various sock
> puppets.
>
> Yrrah

I'm with you.
After several years, I haven't bothered this time.
--
Jim S
Tyneside UK
www.jimscott.co.uk
From: Susan Bugher on
Yrrah wrote:
> Ron May <mayron(a)hotmail.com>:

>> Use this thread to discuss whatever you think is relevant to the
>> subject line. I will monitor this and other PL2009 threads through
>> Google Groups so I don't miss any posts.
>
> I think the whole thing should be called off. There are too many
> nominations from people we have not seen here before / various sock
> puppets.

FWIW. . .

I just skimmed down Ron May's last post listing programs, nominators and
seconders. Most of the names and nicknames looked familiar. I don't know
if any of the names or nicknames were forgeries but IIRC many of the
programs have had MORE than one second. IOW I don't believe your
objection is valid and I don't agree with your proposed remedy.

NOTES:

If you object to the NOMINATION of a program you can/should post your
objections for discussion and ask that the program be removed or placed
on a ware ballot.

In earlier PL selection processes concerns about "ballot stuffing" have
been handled by checking BALLOTS after the VOTE.

Susan
--
Posted to alt.comp.freeware
Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online):
http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware
Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org
Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)